Reworking of the Drude model using scattering statistics

Aaron young
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem I have been set is to rework the Drude model using clearly defined scattering statistics.

Homework Equations


The Drude model as we have been given it is in terms of momentum
\vec{p}(t+dt)=(1-\frac{dt}{\tau})(\vec{p}(t)-q\vec{E}(t)dt)+(\frac{dt}{\tau})(0)
Where that last term represents the contribution of the scattered electrons to the total momentum of the electrons in the system.

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempts so far have focused on trying to use Fermi-Dirac statistics to somehow derive the momentum of a scattered electron (ie. one at thermal velocity) as a function of the average energy of an electron at thermal velocity. I have the horrible feeling I have been barking up completely the wrong tree however, so I am now making an attempt to somehow integrate classical elastic scattering off of nuclei into the equation. I don't know how well this will work though.

If anyone has been given a similar assignment in the past or has an idea what direction sounds most right to be going in some suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Based on a question in a different thread that seems to be similar I have done the following

Probability of scattering per unit time = \lambda
direction after scattering characterised by the solid angle d\Omega '
The probability of a given angle after scattering is given by \omega (\theta)d\Omega '
were \theta is the angle between the incident and scattered momenta, \vec{p} and \vec{p}'.

From this I have said that
\frac{\partial}{\partial t}f(\vec{p},t)=(1-\lambda)unscatteredthing+\lambda scatteredthing
which I have written as
\frac{\partial}{\partial t}f(\vec{p},t)=f(\vec{p},t)-\lambda f(\vec{p},t)+\lambda \int \omega (\theta) f(\vec{p}',t) d\Omega'

What I have gotten agrees with what is in the question containing the prompt I went off except for the first term, which does not feature in the version from the hint in that question.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top