Rigid equilibrium question involving a ladder

  • Thread starter Thread starter LizzleBizzle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving three people carrying a 4.00 m ladder, with each person supporting one-third of the ladder's weight. The key challenge is determining the distance of the two individuals from the far end of the ladder. Participants suggest setting the axis of rotation at the front of the ladder and incorporating the ladder's weight into the equilibrium equations. After adjustments and calculations, one participant concludes that the distance x from the far end is likely 1 meter, while emphasizing the importance of correctly identifying the center of gravity and moments in the problem. The conversation highlights the collaborative effort to clarify the setup and solve the equilibrium equations effectively.
LizzleBizzle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Three people are carrying a horizontal ladder 4.00 m long. One of them holds the front end of the ladder, and the other two hold opposite sides of the ladder the same distance from its far end. What is the distance of the latter two people from the far end of the ladder if each person supports one-third of the ladder's weight?"


Homework Equations



T=F*l
ET=0


The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a picture of the ladder with one person in the front, and two people (x) distance away from the opposite end of the ladder. So, x is the distance from the two people to the far end, and 4-x is the distance of the front person from the two people.

Each holds one-third of the ladder's weight.

I decided I'd set the axis of rotation as the far end of the ladder and set up my equilibrium equation, so...

ET = (2/3w)(x) + (1/3w)(4-x) = 0

And then I kind of got stuck after fiddling around with my equation and getting, uh, nowhere. Tried to throw in a center of gravity equation and realized that wasn't really helping me. Any ideas?


Thanks,
Liz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try setting the person at the front of the ladder at 0.00m, and the other two people at x. Then take the moment about the front of the ladder.

Also, don't forget to take into account the weight of the ladder in your FBD.
 
Hi, Liz, and welcome to Physics Forums! :smile:

LizzleBizzle said:

Homework Statement



"Three people are carrying a horizontal ladder 4.00 m long. One of them holds the front end of the ladder, and the other two hold opposite sides of the ladder the same distance from its far end. What is the distance of the latter two people from the far end of the ladder if each person supports one-third of the ladder's weight?"


Homework Equations



T=F*l
ET=0


The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a picture of the ladder with one person in the front, and two people (x) distance away from the opposite end of the ladder. So, x is the distance from the two people to the far end, and 4-x is the distance of the front person from the two people.
Yes, but what's the distance of the front person from the far end?
Each holds one-third of the ladder's weight.
Yes.
I decided I'd set the axis of rotation as the far end of the ladder and set up my equilibrium equation, so...
good idea
ET = (2/3w)(x) + (1/3w)(4-x) = 0
If you are summing moments about the far end, then you must determine the distance of each force from the far end. What is the distance from the front person to the far end? It is not (4-x). And you forgot to include the moment from the ladder's weight, the resultant force of which acts at the center of gravity of the ladder.
 
p21bass said:
Try setting the person at the front of the ladder at 0.00m, and the other two people at x. Then take the moment about the front of the ladder.
That's an even better idea :approve:
 
Ah ha. After a second cup of coffee, I gained a little more inspiration...thank you for the hints. So here's what I have so far, but maybe I have missed something:

I changed my point of rotation to the front end, as suggested. I accounted for the weight of the ladder.

I found the center of gravity to be (2/3w)(x) + (1/3)w(4) / w , which boils down to 2/3x + 1.3.

In this case, the force of the two guys in the back would rotate clockwise around the axis of rotation, so that value is negative, and the weight, which would rotate counterclockwise, is positive.

So...
ET = 0 = (2/3w)(4-x) - [(w)(2/3x + 1.3)]
0 = 2.6666w - 2/3wx - 2/3wx - 1.3w
1.3w = 1.3wx
x = 1 m?

This answer COULD make sense.
 
Huh? The center of gravity of the ladder would be at the midpoint - don't overthink it. And again, make the location of the two-person support as x. Then solve the equation for sum of moments.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top