Recommendations for Mathematically Rigorous Texts on Statistics and Probability

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks recommendations for a mathematically rigorous statistics text that also incorporates probability, emphasizing a desire for thorough proofs. Another participant suggests starting with "Data Analysis - A Bayesian Tutorial" for its practical approach, which may help identify specific interests in the field. They note the challenge of finding a rigorously mathematical book due to the complexity of the subject. Recommendations include works by Lehmann, which are frequently cited, and a few other titles that offer varying levels of rigor and proof. It is advised to explore these books at a library before purchasing, as personal preference plays a significant role in selecting the right text.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Hi PF, looking for a recommendation on a mathematically rigorous text on statistics (and perhaps probability). I have a decent amount of knowledge on linear & abstract algebra and calculus and analysis, so I don't mind if it uses them. What I don't want is a text that fails to prove its theorems with rigor. Suggestions are appreciated, thanks!

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've done some looking but from what I've seen, books on statistics tend to be pricey and each looks different from the rest. So perhaps it is better to start with a book that is rigorous-looking but practical also, just to get a road map view of things.

Data Analysis - A Bayesian Tutorial might be a good way to start.

After reading this you would hopefully know where your interest lies and could guide yourself to further reading. And it would be useful to know where things fit in. Ultimately, your knowledge of statistics will be organized around how it is used. Use the "look inside" to see if this would be worthwhile.

I can't recommend a completely rigorous book because this subject is so confusing to me.

PS. Here is a cheaper book that claims to be mathematical and rigorous but I can't say if it is good or if it is what you should be learning.
 
Last edited:
Since you haven't had a lot of replies, here is my two cents (from an engineer who uses staistical inference a fair amount but is *not* interested in all the rigor!)

The books by Lehmann seem to be the ones referenced all the time:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387988645/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387985026/?tag=pfamazon01-20

other books the stats people seem to like:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0534243126/?tag=pfamazon01-20
(I own the first edition of this one, which has plenty of proofs but doesn't motivate the statistics very well to someone like me! This is the easiest of all the books I list here)

Another:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0132306379/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Then there is the 60+ year old classic:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691005478/?tag=pfamazon01-20

If I were you I would go to your library and see what works for you. Don't buy any of these without looking at them first. Only YOU know what you are looking for.

best regards,

jason
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top