Ring and Linear Transformation

Treadstone 71
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Let g(x)\in F[x], T\in L(V). Let F[T] be a ring generated by g(T). Show that if g(T) is invertible, then g^{-1}(T)\in F[T].

No idea what do do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The statement of the problem is confusing. I'm going to assume V is a vector space over the field F.

Now, F[T] is not just "a" ring -- it is a very specific ring. It is (isomorphic to) the subring of L(V) that is generated by F and T.

So, I'm confused when you say that you let it be "a ring generated by g(T)".

Did you mean to say something to the effect if:

"Suppose g(T) generates F[T]"

or maybe

"Let F[g(T)] be the ring generated by g(T)"

or even just

"So g(T) is an element of F[T]"

?


(I suspect you meant the first one -- work out what that really means)
 
It's either the first or third. Let's assume the first, since I must show that the inverse of g(T) is a positive powered polynomial.
 
Okay, so what does it mean that g(T) generates F[T]? Any interesting particular cases?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top