Rinkel's modification of Ruchhardt's method

  • Thread starter Thread starter arpon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
Rinkel's modification of Ruchhardt's method involves measuring the distance a ball falls before reversing direction when gas pressure equals atmospheric pressure. The derived equation for this distance is given by mgL = (γpA²L²)/(2V). The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying energy conservation principles in this context, noting that both kinetic and potential energy must be considered. The forces acting on the ball include gravitational force and excess pressure, which is derived from the adiabatic process. This analysis provides a deeper understanding of the dynamics involved in the experiment.
arpon
Messages
234
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


upload_2015-6-4_10-38-43.png

In Ruchhardt’s method of measuring ##\gamma##, illustrated in Fig. 12.2, a ball of mass ##m## is placed snugly inside a tube (cross-sectional area ##A##) connected to a container of gas (volume ##V##). The pressure ##p## of the gas inside the container is slightly greater than atmospheric pressure ##p_0## because of the downward force of the ball, so that
##p = p_0 + \frac{mg}{A}##
Show that if the ball is given a slight downwards displacement, it will undergo simple harmonic motion with period ##T## given by
##T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{mV}{\gamma p A^2}}##
[You may neglect friction. As the oscillations are fairly rapid, the changes in ##p## and ##V## which occur can be treated as occurring adiabatically.]
In Rinkel’s 1929 modification of this experiment, the ball is held in position in the neck where the gas pressure ##p## in the container is exactly equal to air pressure, and then let drop, the distance ##L## that it falls before it starts to go up again is measured.
Show that this distance is given by
##mgL = \frac{\gamma pA^2 L^2}{2V}##

Homework Equations


##pv^\gamma = const. ##

The Attempt at a Solution


I have correctly derived the first equation of period of the SHM.
From this equation, I got,
##\omega ^2 = \frac{pA^2\gamma}{mV}##
upload_2015-6-4_10-54-49.png

As the initial velocity is 0, so
## L = 2 \cdot amplitude##
Applying energy conservation for the point A & B, we get:
##mgL = \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 (\frac{L}{2})^2##
##mgL = \frac{pA^2 \gamma L^2}{8V}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi arpon. You got so involved with presenting this that you forgot to add your question?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Hi arpon. You got so involved with presenting this that you forgot to add your question?
Here is the question:
arpon said:
Show that this distance is given by
##mgL = \frac{\gamma pA^2 L^2}{2V}##
 
forum rules stipulate that complete solutions to homework problems are not allowed
In the second part, I am afraid your application of energy conservation is not accurate; since in both points A and B you should be getting:
Kinetic energy = 0, Potential energy = ##\frac{1}{2} k A^2## for each of them, which do not give the expression required.

So, my approach would be to break down the different force mechanisms here:
There are 2 forces acting upon the ball: The downward gravitational force ##mg## and the upward excess pressure ##\Delta P## which is given by $$\Delta P = \gamma \frac{P_0}{V_0}\Delta V.$$
Here, ##P_0=p_0=p## is the pressure and ##V_0=V## is the volume at point A in the Rinkel's modification set up of the experiment. (Note that the above formula for excess pressure follows directly from the adiabatic nature of the whole process. Just take the derivative of ##PV^\gamma =## constant.)

[ mentor note: some content in this post has had to be edited out to make it compliant with PF homework help rules ][/color]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes arpon
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top