RLC Series Circuit: State Equations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around formulating state equations for an RLC series circuit using the capacitor voltage \(v_c(t)\) and the inductor current \(i_L(t)\) as state variables. Participants explore the mathematical representation of the circuit's dynamics, including differential equations and state transition matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the equation \(e(t) = iR + \frac{di}{dt} + \frac{1}{C}\int i(t)dt\) is a starting point but expresses uncertainty about writing it in terms of states.
  • Another participant proposes a different formulation, \(e(t) = iR + L \frac{di}{dt} + \frac{1}{C}\int i(t)dt\), and interprets "state" as needing to express the differential equation in terms of the unknown variable \(i_L\).
  • A third participant clarifies that the states of the network relate to the energy in reactive elements, identifying \(v_c(t)\) and \(i_L(t)\) as the two state variables and provides governing equations for the network.
  • A fourth participant presents a state transition matrix \(\Phi(s)\) and seeks clarification on the terms \(\mathbf{B}\) and \(\mathbf{U}(s)\), while also discussing the Laplace Transform of the system's equations.
  • Further elaboration on the solution indicates a relationship between the Laplace Transform and the factor \(\frac{2}{s}\), raising questions about the origin of \(\mathbf{U}(s)\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of how to formulate the state equations and the meaning of "state" in this context. There is no consensus on the correct formulation or the definitions of the terms involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific values for resistance, inductance, and capacitance, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these values on the equations presented. The mathematical steps and definitions remain partially unresolved.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Using the capacitor voltage \(v_c(t)\) and the inductor current \(i_L(t)\) as states, write the state equations for the RLC series circuit shown in the figure.

mc8hQL5.png


We can write that \(e(t) = iR + \frac{di}{dt} + \frac{1}{C}\int i(t)dt\). I am not sure with what it wants when it says to write it as states.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't it be $e(t) = iR + L \frac{di}{dt} + \frac{1}{C}\int i(t)dt?$ I think when they say "state", they mean that the DE should be in that unknown variable. So if $i_{L}$ is the state variable, write the DE with $i_{L}$ as the unknown function.
 
dwsmith said:
Using the capacitor voltage \(v_c(t)\) and the inductor current \(i_L(t)\) as states, write the state equations for the RLC series circuit shown in the figure.

mc8hQL5.png


We can write that \(e(t) = iR + \frac{di}{dt} + \frac{1}{C}\int i(t)dt\). I am not sure with what it wants when it says to write it as states.

In electric egeneering are called states of a network somewhat is related to the 'energy' contained in the reactive elements, i.e. the voltage across a capacitors and the current in inductors. In Your case the network has two states, i.e.the two unknown variables are $v_{c} (t)$ and $i_{L} (t)$. The equation governing the network are...

$\displaystyle v_{c} (t) + R\ i_{L}(t) + i_{L}^{\ '} (t) = e(t)$

$\displaystyle v_{c}^{\ '} (t) = C\ i_{L} (t)\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
I have determined my state transition matrix as
\[
\Phi(s) =
\frac{1}{(s + 1)(s + 2)}
\begin{pmatrix}
s & -1\\
2 & s + 3
\end{pmatrix}\Rightarrow
\varphi(t) = e^{-t}
\begin{pmatrix}
2e^{-t} - 1 & e^{-t} - 1\\
2(1 - e^{-t}) & 2 - e^{-t}
\end{pmatrix}.
\]
Then
\[
\begin{pmatrix}
i_L(s)\\
v_c(s)
\end{pmatrix} = \Phi(s)\mathbf{B}\mathbf{U}(s)
\]
What is \(\mathbf{B}\) and \(\mathbf{U}(s)\).
Additionally, I have that
\[
\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{di_L(t)}{dt}\\
\frac{dv_c(t)}{dt}
\end{pmatrix} =
\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{-R}{L} & \frac{-1}{L}\\
\frac{1}{C} & 0
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
i_L(t)\\
v_c(t)
\end{pmatrix}
+
\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{1}{L}\\
0
\end{pmatrix}e(t) \qquad (*)
\]
where \(R = 3\), \(L = 1\), and \(C = \frac{1}{2}\).

The solution has
\[
\Phi(s)\mathbf{B}\mathbf{U}(s) =
\begin{pmatrix}
\frac{s}{(s+1)(s+3)}\\
\frac{2}{(s+1)(s+3)}
\end{pmatrix}
\frac{2}{s}
\begin{pmatrix}
e^{-s} & -e^{-2s}
\end{pmatrix}
\]
Therefore, \(\mathbf{U}(s) = \frac{2}{s}
\begin{pmatrix}
e^{-s} & -e^{-2s}
\end{pmatrix}\) where does this come from?

If we take the Laplace Transform of \((*)\), we end up with the factor \(\frac{2}{s}\). That is, we have
\begin{gather}
I(s) = \frac{E(s) - V(s)}{s + 3}\\
V(s) = \frac{2}{s}I(s)
\end{gather}
but that still leaves the question where does \(U(s)\) come from?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K