Robot Climbs Rope Without Batteries: Project Idea

  • Thread starter Thread starter carzygoul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Robot Rope
AI Thread Summary
The project involves creating a rope-climbing robot that operates without chemical power sources, specifically avoiding batteries. The robot must ascend an 8mm thick rope to a height of approximately 1.5 meters. Suggestions include using two connected rollers with rubber bands or exploring the use of a pullback or wind-up motor for improved climbing efficiency. Weight considerations are crucial, as lighter components like rubber bands may enhance performance. The discussion emphasizes the need for innovative, non-chemical power solutions in robotic design.
carzygoul
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys I have a freaking project that requires me to build a rope climbing robot that cannot be powered by chemical based. Basically no batteries as such are required.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Some background info about the scale and expected complexity of the project will be good to have. Right now I have no clue if you mean just a spring-loaded toy that'll pull on 10 cm of sewing thread, or something like the space elevator climber challenge.
http://www.spaceward.org/elevator2010-pb
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We're basically required to build a robot that is non-chemically powered to climb a rope of 8mm thick to a height of approximately 1.5m
 
carzygoul said:
we're basically required to build a robot that is non-chemically powered to climb a rope of 8mm thick to a height of approximately 1.5m
Simplest thing that comes to mind: Two connected rollers with rubber bands inside, which you wind up.
PHP: 
 |
 |
o|o
 |
 |
 
Last edited:
hmm what if i use a pullback or wind-up motor... u think can climb better?
 
Last edited:
carzygoul said:
hmm what if i use a pullback or wind-up motor... u think can climb better?
If you have one, you can try. But keep in mind that the weight counts. Rubber bands are light.
 

Thread 'Query on Isentropic relationships (such as PV^gamma = constant)'

Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
View full post »

Thread 'Dry sump pump issue'

I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
View full post »

Similar threads

Building a Two Omni Wheel Robot: Questions & Answers
Replies
4
Views
2K
Robot navigation using GPS coordinates with two ultrasonic range finders
Replies
11
Views
3K
Looking for inspiration to work on a project of my own (Robotics)
Replies
5
Views
3K
Electronics Can a Social Distancing Robot Help Us Stay Connected?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Structural Support Triangles for a rope-climbing robot
Replies
2
Views
2K
Interested in pursuing Physics, Robotics, Astronomy
Replies
5
Views
2K
Mechanics for High School Students: Building a Robotic Arm
Replies
3
Views
1K
A good Robotics project for an Engineering Physics undergrad
Replies
3
Views
3K
Fluid Dynamics: Maximizing Downforce Between a Robot and the Floor
Replies
18
Views
3K
Synthetic fibers (rope) that absorb water and shorten
Replies
8
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top