What Is the Exhaust Velocity of a Rocket Engine?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around calculating the exhaust velocity of a rocket engine, specifically using the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) as a case study. Participants explore the relevant formulas, the properties of the gases involved, and the implications of chamber pressure on performance and design.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for exhaust velocity and seeks clarification on the molecular mass of the combustion products, questioning whether to use the masses of oxygen and hydrogen separately or their combined form as water.
  • Another participant suggests using the mean molecular mass based on the mixture ratio of hydrogen to oxygen in the SSME, indicating a 6:1 ratio of H2 to O2.
  • A participant recalls chemical reactions involved in combustion and asks whether the exhaust velocity refers to initial or final velocity, linking it to a previous problem involving rocket velocity.
  • One participant expresses interest in determining chamber pressure without testing, discussing the conversion of pressure units and its implications for calculating adiabatic flame temperature.
  • A response highlights that chamber pressure is influenced by turbopump work and combustion dynamics, emphasizing that exit velocity is measured at the nozzle exit.
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of calculating various parameters at chamber pressures exceeding 250 atm, prompting discussion about structural limitations and material strength.
  • Participants discuss the trade-offs between pressure, temperature, and structural weight, noting that higher pressures require stronger materials, which can increase engine weight.
  • Concerns are raised about mechanical limits related to high temperatures and stresses, with references to practical limits based on material properties.
  • One participant connects the operational pressures of different engines, suggesting that the SSME can achieve higher pressures due to the properties of its fuel, and inquires about the temperature corresponding to 0.7 times the melting temperature of materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the calculations and implications of exhaust velocity, chamber pressure, and material limits. There is no consensus on the best approach to calculate certain parameters or the implications of high chamber pressures.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various sources and formulas, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the relationships between pressure, temperature, and material properties. Some calculations depend on specific definitions and conditions that are not fully established in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in rocket propulsion, thermodynamics, and engineering design may find the discussion relevant, particularly those exploring the complexities of exhaust velocity calculations and the effects of combustion chamber conditions.

.:Endeavour:.
Messages
80
Reaction score
1
I want to calculate the exhaust velocity of a rocket. This is the formula that I found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_engine_nozzles which is:
<br /> V_e = \sqrt{{\frac{T*R}{M}}*{\frac{2*k}{k-1}}*[1-(P_e/P)^(^k^-^2^)^/^k] }<br />

Ve = Exhaust velocity at nozzle exit, m/s
T = absolute temperature of inlet gas, K
R = Universal gas law constant = 8314.5 J/(kmol·K)
M = the gas molecular mass, kg/kmol (also known as the molecular weight)
k = cp / cv = isentropic expansion factor
cp = specific heat of the gas at constant pressure
cv = specific heat of the gas at constant volume
Pe = absolute pressure of exhaust gas at nozzle exit, Pa
P = absolute pressure of inlet gas, Pa

I'll use 1 of the Space Shuttle Main Engine for this equation. The statistics for the SSME are:
  1. Thrust at Lift Off = 1.8 MN
  2. Chamber pressure = 18.9399 MPa
  3. Nozzle Area ratio = 77
  4. Exhaust Velocity = 3,560 m/s
  5. Chamber Temperature = 3,573.15 Kelvin
  6. SSME consume 3,917 liters per second of fuel
  7. Exit Pressure = 7.2326 kilopascals

For the molecular mass, do I have to find the mass of it in moles for Oxygen and Hydrogen separately or when they mix together to form H2O? I would like an explanation on what is cp / cv to further understand the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One would use the mean molecular mass, which in the case of the SSME is H2O and H2. The mean or average molecular mass is weighted by the mole fractions.

The mixing ratio for SSME is 6:1 H2:O2, which would yield a 2:1 H2 to H2O

Ref: http://www.spaceandtech.com/spacedata/engines/ssme_specs.shtml

http://www.pw.utc.com/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.jsp?vgnextrefresh=1&vgnextoid=75a0184c712de010VgnVCM100000c45a529fRCRD

http://www.braeunig.us/space/comb-OH.htm

http://www.braeunig.us/space/propuls.htm - see Eq. 1.22

Sample problems - http://www.braeunig.us/space/problem.htm#1.5
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I remeber from chemistry this how I'll calculate the 02 and the H2 mixture which is:
O2 + H2 = H2O
2O2 + 4H2 = 2H2O and CO2 with CO (because its a conbustion)

I'll check the problems from the link that you posted, thank you for your help. My last question is the exhaust velocity of the rocket is its initial velocity or final velocity? I did a problem dealing with a rocket and I need it to find the velocityf of a rocket using the Pi = Pf formula.
 
Last edited:
I've looked over the problem from http://www.braeunig.us/space/problem.htm#1.5 and I'll like to figure out how to find the chamber pressure of a rocket engine without actually having to test an engine.

I'll be using the SSME to find it's exhaust velocity. The chamber pressure of the engine is 18.9399 MPa or 18,939,900 Pa or 186,922.2798 atm. The only problem is that you cannot find the rest of its schematics in the chart that the site provides. Is there a way to do it because I think if I changed 186,922.2798 atm to 186.9222798 atm by moving the decimal 3 spaces to the left then I can find its Adiabatic Flame Temperature when the chamber pressure is 186.9222798 atm the temperature is 3,650 Kelvin. Because I moved the decimal 3spaces to the left, I move the decimal 3 spaces to the right which gives me 3,650,000 Kelvin. Can I use this method in finding other variables from the Pchamber when its off the charts?
 
The pressure would be determined by the work of the turbopumps which compress the fluids, LOX and LH2, and force them into the combustion chamber. The fluids mix and combust, so that over a short distance, they must go from cryogenic temperatures to about ~3600 K!

The combustion chamber has the maximum pressure in the system, and the pressure falls through the throat with the pressure gradient increasing beyond the minimum diameter in the throat through the nozzle.

The exit velocity, by convention is measured at the nozzle exit.

See page 33 (and figure 2-1) of this Rocket Propulsion Elements by George P. Sutton, Oscar Biblarz

Because I moved the decimal 3spaces to the left, I move the decimal 3 spaces to the right which gives me 3,650,000 Kelvin.
One cannot simply move the decimal 3 places in this way. This is not correct.

One has to look at the change in density of the combustion mixture as temperature increases. One has to consider the mass (continuity), momentum and energy balance equations.
 
Last edited:
But is there away to calculate the Optimum Mixture Ratio, Adiabatic Flame Temperature, Gas Molecular Weight, and the Specific Heat Ratio when the Pc is more than 250 atm?
 
Where does one obtain 250 atm, which is significantly greater than 189 in the SSME, which is pretty much optimized? The higher the pressure, the greater the necessary strength of the throat and nozzle materials at temeprature, which means the greater the mass of the structural material in order to minimize the stress.
 
Yeah, it is greater than the SSME engines and also the F-1 engine. So the more pressure there is in the combustion chamber the heavier the engine is going to be to widstand the high pressure and temperature of the engine so it doesn't burst or melt. There is a limit on how much pressure you can have in an engine before it becomes too heavy to fly, right?
 
There are practical mechanical limits on structures that must operate at high temperature, and high temperature creep and stress are limiting at temperatures below melting. IIRC, the practical limit is about 0.7 Tmelt. The nozzle structure is cooled by the incoming coolant, but then there are significant thermal gradients on the structure. There is a trade off between thickness (in order to reduce stress for a given load) and thiness for cooling.
 
  • #10
That's the reason why the F-1 engine operated at 69.085 atm and the SSME operate at 186.922 atm because the difference of their fuel. The SSME can obtain a higher pressure because the Adiabatic Flame Temperature for kerosene is higher than hydrogen at low pressures. What temperature is 0.7 Tmelt?
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
17K