Rolling Motion on Rough Surfaces

AI Thread Summary
Friction is essential for initiating rolling motion on rough surfaces, but once an object is rolling without slipping on a horizontal surface, it does not require static friction to maintain that motion. The concept of "cold locking" between the surface's features and the object's surface allows for rolling without slipping. In an ideal scenario, if the object's rotation matches its forward speed, the point of contact has zero velocity, eliminating relative motion and thus friction. However, real-world factors like deformation and rolling friction will eventually slow the object down. Therefore, while friction is crucial for starting rolling, it is not necessary to sustain it on a horizontal surface.
paragchitnis
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Friction is necessary to make motion rolling but if the body is already in rolling motion on rough surface without slipping then, is friction necessary to continue the rolling motion ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paragchitnis said:
Friction is necessary to make motion rolling but if the body is already in rolling motion on rough surface without slipping then, is friction necessary to continue the rolling motion ?
No, not if the surface is horizontal. Once an object is rolling along a horizontal surface, no static friction is required to maintain that rolling motion. (Of course, in 'real life' deformation and rolling friction will slow the object down.)
 
I am confused on the same thing.
Friction force occurs due to cold locking between the crests and troughs of rough surface and the surface of the body. So without such locking, how could it roll?
 
a.ratnaparkhi said:
Friction force occurs due to cold locking between the crests and troughs of rough surface and the surface of the body. So without such locking, how could it roll?
In an abstract, imaginary situation, the object would just happen to be rotating at a rate where it's circumference surface speed is the same as the speed that the object is moving forwards.
 
Once the body starts rolling then velocity at point of contact become zero. Hence there is no relative motion between body and surface at that point and hence no friction.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top