Rolling Object on Curved Surface: Lagrangian Mechanics + Constraint

physicsnewblol
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to be able to plot a trajectory wrt time of a ball that rolls without slip on a curved surface.

Known variables:
-radius/mass/moment of inertia of the ball.
-formula for the curvature of the path (quadratic)
-formula relating path length and corresponding height above the ground. (linearly decreasing, i.e. as you travel down the curve, you decrease in height).

Homework Equations


Euler-Lagrange Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


See attached for further details.

I've come up with an answer for the acceleration of the ball along the path length. However, it isn't a function of the starting height as I expected. I suspect I may have made an assumption that I'm not supposed to but I can't see what it is.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


After some though and comparison to classical mechanics, I've determined that the assumption that the height of the ball decreases linearly with arc length is not correct.

It seems my potential term is going to be some complicated function of arc length.

Anyone else have thoughts?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top