Rolling Pendulum: Solving the Dynamics Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the dynamical equations of motion for a system consisting of a rolling wheel with a rubber tire and a coupled pendulum. The pendulum swings freely while the wheel rolls on a suspended rail, with energy loss attributed to rolling resistance. The user seeks to understand the governing equations without requiring a complete solution. Key variables include the normal force, total mass, effective mass of the pendulum, and the coefficient of rolling resistance. The system is characterized by large amplitude swings, ranging from -π/2 to +π/2.
Andy Froncioni
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
(This is NOT a homework problem. It's an engineering problem I'm trying to crack.)

A wheel with a rubber tire (friction) can roll on a suspended rail. Attached to it is a pendulum that's rigidly mounted on the axle of the wheel with a mass that can hand down and swing. (The wheel's rotation and the pendulum's are coupled.)

The system swings freely and due to the energy lost to rolling resistance of the tire against the rail ( F = N*Crr ), the system's amplitude decreases over time.

I am trying to find the dynamical equations of motion of this system.

d (theta)/dt = alpha

d(alpha)/dt = f(Crr,M,L,R,m,...)Can anyone help me? I know the equation for the normal force on the wheel axle is given by something like:

N - M*g - m*v^2/L cos(theta) = 0, where
N = normal force
M is the total mass of the system
m is the effective mass of the pendulum portion
v is the velodity of the COM of the pendulum portion
theta is the angle of the pendulum to the vertical
Crr is the coeff of rolling resistance of the tire
fdcin.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Small amplitude or large amplitude of swing ?
 
Nidum said:
Small amplitude or large amplitude of swing ?
Large amplitude. -pi/2 to +pi/2

I don't want the solution. I want to understand the governing equations.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
81
Views
13K
Back
Top