Rotating Stator: Permanent Magnets & Rotor Polarity Change

  • Thread starter Thread starter deuel18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating Stator
AI Thread Summary
Permanent magnets can be used in a rotating magnetic field motor, but the terminology can be confusing since "stator" typically refers to stationary components. The discussion highlights the concept of using rotating elements to change polarity in relation to the rotor, similar to the operation of intake and exhaust valves in an internal combustion engine. The brushless motor design features stationary windings with rotating permanent magnets, which is essential for creating the desired magnetic field. A speed controller is necessary to synchronize the magnetic field's rotation with the rotor's speed. This innovative approach allows for efficient motor operation while maintaining clarity in terminology.
deuel18
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Hello. I just want to know if it is possible to have permanent magnets as Stator in a Rotating Magnetic field morot. However, these Stators rotates to change their polarities in relation with the Rotor. Much like the harmony of Intake/Exhaust valves in an Internal Combustion Engine.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it rotates, it's not a stator, which is defined as not rotating.
 
I know but i just used the 'term' so readers could see the perspective I am at. Because if I say rotor and then rotor, what's the difference? So I had to use the same term.
 
Brushless motor with stationary windings in the middle and permanent magnets rotating around it...

http://www.rcuniverse.com/magazine/reviews/956/Outrunner_Inside.jpg

The speed controller makes the field in the windings rotate at same rpm as the outer rotor.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top