Rotation of PPL by opticaly active compounds (mathematical feeling)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a formula related to Verdet's equation for measuring the concentration of optically active substances, factoring in temperature variations. The original formula is modified to express concentration in terms of mass and tube dimensions. While the modified formula is mathematically correct, practical challenges arise in accurately filling a tube to a specified cross-section without spills or gas bubbles. The conversation also addresses the implications of changing the tube length on the rotation (Θ), highlighting that the effect depends on whether mass or concentration is held constant. If mass remains constant, rotation remains unchanged; if concentration is constant, rotation doubles with tube length. The discussion emphasizes the balance between theoretical formulations and practical application in scientific measurements.
namanjain
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
i read formulae in textbook :

[α]λt°C = Θ/L*C ...(i)

where Θ is rotation in light
and L is length of tube
and C is concentration in gm/litre

if we consider tube of lenth L and cross section area 'A'
then C= M/A*L
M is mass of sample

so (i) becomes

[α]λt°C = Θ/[M/A]

so are scientist so blind to observe or i am doing something wrong.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This appears to be a variation on Verdet's equation for measuring the concentration of an optically active substance, allowing for temperature variations.

You have neatly removed the variable for concentration.
 
To blind to observe what?
Your formula is correct, however, I doubt that it is more practical. The point is that you would have to fill the sample of the given mass in a tube which has precisely the cross section you sprecified. Have you tried to fill a tube with precisely the amount of substance you want and to put glass windows on it without neither liquid spilling out or gas bubbles remaining inside?
 
DrDu said:
To blind to observe what?
Your formula is correct, however, I doubt that it is more practical. The point is that you would have to fill the sample of the given mass in a tube which has precisely the cross section you sprecified. Have you tried to fill a tube with precisely the amount of substance you want and to put glass windows on it without neither liquid spilling out or gas bubbles remaining inside?

DO IMPROVIZE MY LAST STATEMENT I WANT TO ASK:
the older equation has a feeling that if length of tube is increased one of factor will have to change and my equation marks that rotation(θ) and [α] are both independent of length of tube. I am just a bit confused for example help out with this

Q) if length of tube is doubled what will be the effect on Θ?
 
Depends on what you hold constant. If M is constant, nothing, if c is constant, theta will double.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top