Rotation within a vacuum vs rotation with a pressurized environment.

  • Thread starter Thread starter BAUCE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Vacuum
AI Thread Summary
An object can theoretically spin indefinitely in a vacuum, but placing it in a pressurized environment may cause it to slow down due to various forces. Calculating the time it takes for an object to stop rotating in such an environment involves understanding the forces acting on it, possibly including shape alterations. The discussion also touches on the challenge of capturing space debris, where stopping or matching the rotation is crucial. One proposed method involves surrounding the debris with a pressurized space to halt its spin, but this raises questions about feasibility. Conservation of momentum is a key principle that complicates this approach, suggesting that simply pressurizing the space may not effectively stop the rotation.
BAUCE
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
common sense tells me that if an object can remain spinning in the vacuum of space for eternity, than placing that same object within a pressurised environment will cause the object to slow to a stop. is there a way for me to calculate the time in which it would take an object to stop rotating within a pressurised environment? the goal would be to achieve the fastest time in stopping an object from spinning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BAUCE said:
the goal would be to achieve the fastest time in stopping an object from spinning.
By what means? Changing the shape of the object?
 
A.T. said:
By what means? Changing the shape of the object?
thinking along the lines of trash in space. in order to reach out and grab a piece of debris, either it has to stop spinning, or the rotation must be matched. my thought is that rather than 'grabbing' it, surround it and pressurise the space around it so to stop the rotation.
 
BAUCE said:
thinking along the lines of trash in space. in order to reach out and grab a piece of debris, either it has to stop spinning, or the rotation must be matched. my thought is that rather than 'grabbing' it, surround it and pressurise the space around it so to stop the rotation.
Sorry, but this doesn't make any sense to me. Why would you do it?
 
BAUCE said:
thinking along the lines of trash in space. in order to reach out and grab a piece of debris, either it has to stop spinning, or the rotation must be matched. my thought is that rather than 'grabbing' it, surround it and pressurise the space around it so to stop the rotation.
That won't work because of conservation of momentum. We don't know your background. Do you understand "because of conservation of momentum" ?
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top