Rotational Edge Drop: Angular Velocity & Translation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a box that is 27.5" tall and 41" long, weighing 480 lbs, which is partially elevated and dropped to assess its rotational behavior. The main focus is on determining whether the box will continue to rotate and fall onto its side after being dropped from a height of 12" while one edge rests on a 3.5" tall block. The user has successfully calculated the angular velocity but struggles with translating the motion when the box switches the edge it rotates about. The inquiry emphasizes the need for understanding the dynamics of rotational motion and edge transitions. The conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing rotational motion in practical scenarios.
toddar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So here is the problem I have. There is a box that is 27.5" tall and 41" tall with a mass of 480lbs. One edge is put on a 3.5" tall block while the other is raised 12" and dropped. The question is to see if the block will continue to rotate and fall on it's side. I have been able to find the angular velocity but am unable to translate that portion of it when it switches edges it is rotating about.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
toddar said:
So here is the problem I have. There is a box that is 27.5" tall and 41" tall with a mass of 480lbs. One edge is put on a 3.5" tall block while the other is raised 12" and dropped. The question is to see if the block will continue to rotate and fall on it's side. I have been able to find the angular velocity but am unable to translate that portion of it when it switches edges it is rotating about.

Welcome to the PF.

Where's the egg?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top