Rotational inertia, angular speed, and kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving two skaters who rotate around a pole after grabbing it while skating towards each other. Key points include the need to apply conservation of angular momentum to determine the new angular speed after the skaters pull closer together, rather than simply calculating based on assumed radius and velocity. The kinetic energy of the system changes because the skaters do work to pull themselves in, adding energy to the system. The initial calculations for angular speed and kinetic energy were incorrect due to overlooking this principle. Overall, the conservation of angular momentum is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
bonekrushur
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two skaters, each of mass 50 kg, approach each other along parallel paths separated by 4.0 m. They have opposite velocities of 1.7 m/s each. One skater carries one end of a long pole with negligible mass, and the second skater grabs the other end of it as she passes. The skaters then rotate around the center of the pole. Assume that the friction between skates and ice is negligible.

(a) What is the radius of the circle they now skate in?
(b) What is the angular speed of the skaters?
(c) What is the kinetic energy of the two-skater system?
(d) Next, the skaters pull along the pole until they are separated by 0.7 m. What is their angular speed then?
(e) Calculate the kinetic energy of the system now.


Homework Equations



w= v/r
ke= 0.5*I*w^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I have figured out parts (a), (b), and (c). For part (d), I used the same process as in part (b). In (d), I assumed that the new radius was .35 m, and the velocity was still 1.7. So, 1.7/.35 should equal the new angular speed, but that answer does not work. In part (e), I still used what I think is the new radius, .35 m, and put the values into the Kinetic energy equation: 0.5*(50*(.35)^2+50*(.35)^2)*(1.7/.35)^2 = 0.5*I*w^2. This answer does not work either, but I have to be missing something in part (d) to begin with, and I have to get that first anyway to solve (e). Does anyone see what I'm forgetting here? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bonekrushur said:
In (d), I assumed that the new radius was .35 m,

So far so good. o:)

and the velocity was still 1.7.

I think that's where you went wrong. :frown:

Use conservation of angular momentum for part (d). The only things acting on the system are the skaters themselves, thus there are no external torques, which means that conservation of angular momentum applies. Set the angular momentum, before and after the skaters pull themselves closer together, equal to each other. Solve for the new \omega.

Why does the kinetic energy change? The skaters have to do work to pull themselves inwards. The skaters are adding energy to the system in the form of work. But change in kinetic energy or not, angular momentum is still conserved.
 
Thanks. I got it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top