Rotational Inertia of a Rigid Body with Joined Rods

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shatzkinator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational inertia of a system of four particles with given masses and coordinates about the x, y, and z axes. Participants clarify that the parallel axis theorem is not necessary for point masses, as the definition of moment of inertia should be applied instead. A specific example involving two joined rods is also presented, prompting questions about calculating rotational inertia about different axes. The conversation highlights confusion around applying the correct formulas for both point masses and rigid bodies. Overall, the thread emphasizes understanding the fundamental concepts of rotational inertia in different contexts.
Shatzkinator
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The masses and coordinates of four particles are as follows: 27 g, x = 2.0 cm, y = 2.0 cm; 16 g, x = 0, y = 4.0 cm; 43 g, x = -3.0 cm, y = -3.0 cm; 61 g, x = -2.0 cm, y = 4.0 cm. What are the rotational inertias of this collection about the (a) x, (b) y, and (c) z axes?


Homework Equations


I'm not sure.. would I use parallel axis theorem?


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to solve this problem.. help please =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shatzkinator said:
I'm not sure.. would I use parallel axis theorem?

Hi Shatzkinator! :smile:

You only need the parallel axis theorem for a solid body, for which you already know the moment of inertia about its c.o.m.

These are just point masses, so just use the definition of moment of inertia (rotational inertia) :wink:
 


Two thin rods (each of mass 0.50 kg) are joined together to form a rigid body as shown in Fig. 10-66. One of the rods has length L1 = 0.30 m, and the other has length L2 = 0.60 m. What is the rotational inertia of this rigid body about (a) an axis that is perpendicular to the plane of the paper and passes through the center of the shorter rod and (b) an axis that is perpendicular to the plane of the paper and passes through the center of the longer rod?


Fig. 10-66
Problem 114.

also this question i can't get part B
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top