Rotational Intertia of a rotating Space Station

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of a space station influenced by four rockets exerting a force of 65.5N. The torque generated by the rockets is calculated as 2934.4 N·m, leading to the formula I = τ/α, where α is the angular acceleration of 3.63 x 10^-3 rads^-2. The resulting calculation yields a moment of inertia of 808374.7 kg·m², though there was initial confusion regarding the units. Participants confirm the method is correct, emphasizing that the proper unit for rotational inertia is kg·m².
slingshotnz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Four rockets attached to a (wheel) space station exert a force of 65.5N to rotate it . The space station's angular velocity is increased at a constant acceleration of 3.63 x 10-3 rads-2. Each rocket is 11.2m away from the centre. Calculate the rotational inertia of the system.

Homework Equations



τ=Iα , others unknown.

The Attempt at a Solution


Torque of all 4 rockets. (65.5N * 11.2) * 4 = 2934.4N
since τ=Iα, I=τ/α hence I= 2934.4/3.63x10-3 = 808374.7Kgm2

Can anyone confirm if this is the correct method.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The units for inertia are wrong. What are the derived units for the Newton? (Hint: F = ma)
 
Sorry Kg metres squared?. Other than that does the working look fine? I appreciate the advice.
 
Last edited:
Not sure, but I think SteamKing may be referring to this item:
slingshotnz said:
Torque of all 4 rockets. (65.5N * 11.2) * 4 = 2934.4N
force in N * distance in m gives what units?
(Your method and answer look ok.)
 
I missed the torque units. But the units for moment of inertia should be kg-m^2. OP originally had kg-m^-2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top