Rotational Kinematics - A gymnast is performing a

AI Thread Summary
A gymnast's floor routine involves increasing her angular velocity from 2.60 rev/s to 5.40 rev/s while completing half a revolution. The initial attempt to calculate the time for this maneuver incorrectly mixed units and used an incorrect angular displacement. The correct angular displacement for half a revolution is 1/2 rev, not 2π. Using the appropriate equation and values, the time taken for the maneuver is calculated to be 0.125 seconds. This highlights the importance of consistent unit usage in rotational kinematics.
crono_
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
NOTE: In playing with the symbols it appears that I've made pi to be an exponent...um...so anytime you see that, please disregard it as pi is not meant to be an exponent anywhere here. Thanks!

Homework Statement



A gymnast is performing a floor routine. In a tumbling run she spins through the air, increasing her angular velocity from 2.60 to 5.40 rev/s while rotating through one half of a revolution. How much time does this maneuver take?

\omegao = 2.60 rev/s

\omegaf = 5.40 rev/s

t = ?

\vartheta = 2\pi rev ---> But she only goes through 1/2 revolution. So this would be \vartheta = 2\pi rev / 2 . Or so I thought...

Homework Equations



I figured this equation would be appropriate since all variables, except t, are known.

\vartheta = 1/2 (\omegao + \omegaf) t

The Attempt at a Solution



\vartheta = 1/2 (\omegao + \omegaf) t

Solve for t

t = 2\vartheta / (\omegao + \omegaf

t = 2 (2\pi rev / 2) / (2.60 + 5.40)

t = 6.2831 [STRIKE]rev [/STRIKE]/ 8 [STRIKE]rev[/STRIKE]/s

t = 0.785s

Buuuut...this is wrong. Any thoughts as I seem to be missing something?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\omega_0 and \omega_f are given in rev/s, not rad/s
 
I didn't know there was a difference...

My textbook says the following:

Angular displacement is often expressed in one of three units. The first is the familiar degree, and it is well known that there are 360 degrees in a circle. The second unit is the revolution (rev), one revolution representing one complete turn of 360°. The most useful unit from a scientific viewpoint, however, is the SI unit called the radian (rad).

I interpreted that as 360 degrees, 1 rev, and 1 rad are all different ways of saying the same thing. 360 degrees = 1 rev = 1 rad

Apparently not?
 
crono_ said:
I interpreted that as 360 degrees, 1 rev, and 1 rad are all different ways of saying the same thing. 360 degrees = 1 rev = 1 rad

Apparently not?
Nope. Note that the quoted paragraph from your text doesn't define the radian. (I suspect a later paragraph does.)

360° = 1 rev = 2pi radians.

Since your problem used revs, just stick with that. Don't mix units. The angle is 1/2 rev.
 
Hrmmm...

Okay, so then rather than putting \vartheta = 2pi, it should just be \vartheta = 1/2 rev.

So the equation should look like:

t = 2 (1/2 rev) / 2.60 rev/s + 5.40 rev/s

t = 0.125 s

Correct?
 
Correct!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top