Rotational KINEMATICS (confusing)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular acceleration (α) of a toy train accelerating on a circular track. The user initially calculated the angular displacement (θ) and attempted to find the final and initial angular velocities (ωf and ωo) using linear speeds and radius. There was confusion regarding the relationship between linear and angular velocities, specifically the equation v = ωr. Clarification was provided that once angular velocity is determined, α can be calculated using kinematic equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between tangential and angular velocities in rotational motion.
avenkat0
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) A 1.79 kg toy train accelerates constantly from 0.82 m/s to 3.43 m/s in 0.479 revolutions while traveling around a circular track of r 16.7 cm. Find:

- α, magnitude of the angular acceleration.

Homework Equations


img23.gif

img22.gif

The Attempt at a Solution


  1. I first tried getting θ=(.479)(2pi)=3.009
  2. Then I found both the ωf and the ωo by finding the frequencies... I did this by first finding the distence covered by the partial revolution then using the velocity. I did this for both the ω's...
  3. Then i simply used the kinematic analog equation for rotational bodies and got α to be .00656 rad/sec2 and this came out to be wrong
Is there a flaw in my reasoning
Thank You
 

Attachments

  • img23.gif
    img23.gif
    1.3 KB · Views: 426
Physics news on Phys.org
avenkat0 said:
Then I found both the ωf and the ωo by finding the frequencies... I did this by first finding the distence covered by the partial revolution then using the velocity. I did this for both the ω's...
I don't quite understand this step. Angular and tangential speeds are related by v = ωr.
 
Isn't w-2pi(f)
 
avenkat0 said:
Isn't w-2pi(f)
Do you mean does ω = 2pi(f)? Sure, you could think of it that way, but I don't see the point. You are given the linear speeds and the radius, so the angular speeds can be found immediately. (But, done correctly, you should get the same answer either way. Does your method give you the same answer?)
 
Ooh so after I find the angular velocity I would just Use the equations to find alpha??

And can you also explain why the tangental and angular velocities are related by v=omega (r)... Will an object traveling at 5 m/s linearly be going at 2.5 rad/s because it's going around a circle with radius 2?
 
Last edited:
avenkat0 said:
Ooh so after I find the angular velocity I would just Use the equations to find alpha??
Sure.
And can you also explain why the tangental and angular velocities are related by v=omega (r)... Will an object traveling at 5 m/s linearly be going at 2.5 rad/s because it's going around a circle with radius 2?
Yes.

Read this: Rotational Quantities
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top