Rotational kinetic energy and power

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the rotational kinetic energy and average power for a circular saw blade with a diameter of 30 cm and mass of 0.9 kg operating at 4000 rpm. The rotational kinetic energy is calculated using the formula K=(1/2)Iw^2, yielding a result of approximately 886.08 Joules. For average power, the discussion highlights that the question lacks specificity regarding the time taken to reach 4000 rpm, which is crucial for determining power. A suggested time of 15 seconds leads to an average power calculation of about 59.072 Watts. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between energy, time, and power in rotational systems.
warmfire540
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
A 30-cm diameter circular saw blade has a mass of 0.9 kg distributed uniformly in a disc.
(a) What is its rotational kinetic energy when it is operating at 4000 rpm?
(b) What average power must be applied to bring the blade from rest to its operating 4000 rpm?


Just making sure I'm doing this right...

a. Inertia=(1/2)mr^2
I=(1/2)(.9)(.15)^2
I=.0101
w=418.88
K=(1/2)Iw^2
K=(1/2)(.0101)(418.88)^2
K=886.08

b. P=average force
torque=r*F
torque=I*ang (ang being angular velocity)
so:
I*ang=r*f
F=I*ang/r


ergh...now i come to a block!
I don't know how to find acceleration without time..or how to find Force..am i on the right track here?
any help please! thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
torque=I*ang (ang being angular velocity)

No, torque = I*alpha where alpha is the angular acceleration. ("I*ang" is angular momentum)
 
hage567 said:
No, torque = I*alpha where alpha is the angular acceleration. ("I*ang" is angular momentum)

okay..well i said the wrong letter, but i still don't know where to go from here..
 
firstly, you said that: P = average force. If by 'P' you mean Power, then this is totally wrong. Power is average energy per unit time [it actually is the rate of change of energy w.r.t time].

secondly, the second question is incomplete. Power talks about how much energy is supplied in unit time. A disc rotating at a constant angular velocity, 4000rpm has a specific amount of energy which does not change. Hence, to reach that energy, any amount of power is sufficient. The difference is just in how fast that rpm is achieved. More power means, the rpm will be achieved in smaller time and less power means that the rpm will be achieved in lesser time. A complete question would be something like:

(b) What average power must be applied to bring the blade from rest to its operating 4000 rpm in 200 seconds?

To do this kind of question, you just take the initial RKE and the final RKE to get the change in RKE. This change must equate the work done on it. And the source supplies this energy. Then divide this energy by the time it needs to be done in and you'll get the average power.
 
Okay, the professor said I just pick a reasonable time.. so I'll say t=15s
so now P=w/t
P=886.08/15
Power=59.072
done?
 
warmfire540 said:
Okay, the professor said I just pick a reasonable time.. so I'll say t=15s
so now P=w/t
P=886.08/15
Power=59.072
done?

Yes. However, a 'reasonable time' is truly meaningless. In a car, you achieve 8000 rpm [it's a small, economy car] in less than 1 second in the first gear whereas it may take around 8-9 seconds in the 5th gear. But anyways, as long as you get the concept.. nothing else really matters :approve:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top