Rotational Kinetic ENERGY (well laid out)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational kinetic energy of a system consisting of three point masses on a rigid rod. The center of mass was initially calculated incorrectly, leading to confusion regarding the application of the parallel axis theorem. Participants clarified that the kinetic energy can be calculated using the formula KE = 1/2 mω²r² for each mass, where 'r' represents the distance from the rotation axis. There was also a debate about whether the center of mass is affected by the differing masses of the particles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining distances for each mass in relation to the axis of rotation.
avenkat0
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


c) Three point masses lie on a rigid, rod of no mass and L = 7.71 m :

- Two particles,with the same mass m = 3.27 kg, lie on opposite ends.
- Mass M = 3.24 kg is in the center of the rod.

the rod lies along the x-axis, and rotates about the y-axis. about a point 1.68 m from one end at constant angular speed ω = 5.82 rad/s.

Find the kinetic energy of this system:

Homework Equations


paxf.gif

b58abc3fd0f9af6b9edc9a757cefab42.png

08e0a8752d874e5d0253013661e0295d.png


The Attempt at a Solution


  1. First I calculated the center of mass which i found to be at 3.864 m from one end point.
  2. I calculated the KE of rotation from the axis running through the cm.
  3. Then i used the parallel axis theorem. With d being... the distance of the rotation point form rod+the distance of the rod left from the cm
  4. now with d i used the parallel axis theorem and got the wrong answer

Is my reasoning flawed?
Thank you for your help
 

Attachments

  • paxf.gif
    paxf.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 360
Physics news on Phys.org
The center of mass is right in the middle (7.71/2=3.855 from either end).
You don't need the moment of inertia.
You have point masses at different distances from the axis.
KE=1/2 m*omega^2*r^2 for each mass.
r1=L-1.68m, r2=L/2+1.68m, r3=1.68m
 
nasu said:
The center of mass is right in the middle (7.71/2=3.855 from either end).
Isnt the center of mass Dependant of all 3 point masses?
so won't it be a little off the center since the middle mass is a little lighter?

and can you also explain how you got the three r's
nasu said:
r1=L-1.68m, r2=L/2+1.68m, r3=1.68m

Thank you very much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top