Rotational Motion: Energy Conservation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a sliding block and a pulley system, where energy conservation principles are applied to predict the velocity of the block at a second photogate. The user successfully sets up the energy equations, incorporating kinetic energy and friction, leading to a calculated velocity of 1.5855 m/s. They express uncertainty about whether this result is coincidental or valid. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding acceleration and rotational dynamics to derive the correct final velocity. Overall, the energy method proves effective in solving the problem accurately.
SpringWater
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the sliding block has a mass of .850kg the counterweight has a mass of .420kg , and the pulley has a mass of .350kg with outer and inner radius .030m, .020m, the coefficient of friction is .250. the pulley turns the axle. the light cord does not stretch and does not slip on the pulley. The block has velocity of .820m/s towards the pulley when passes by photogate . use the energy method to predict the velocity it moved to a second photogate. .700m away?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I understand how to set up the problem using
ΔKE (initial)= ΔKE (final)

however i am wondering if this is possible...
Ke(m1)+KE(m2)+KE(rot)=(uk)(m1)(g)(X)

(V)^(2)*((.5)(m1)+(.5)(m2)+(.5)(I)(1/(r)^(2)))=(μk)(m1)(g)(X)

Where I=2.275E-4 & r=.02m & X=.7m By doing this i get V=1.5855 m/s

This is the correct answer! Did i get the correct answer just by coincidence or is this actually possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the fact that W=ΔEk

So you get:

h=separation between photogates
a=acceleration of the system
m=mass of the block moving through the photogate
M=mass of the other block
v=velocity of the system

mah=0.5m(v22-v12)

So the only thing you need to know in order to solve for v2 in the equation above is a, which you can get using rotational formulas and Newton's laws.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top