Rotational Motion of a Mass on a Table: Solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the rotational motion of a ruler on a frictionless table after an impulse is applied. It clarifies that the ruler rotates about its center of mass, but also raises the question of the instantaneous axis of rotation due to translation. Participants discuss the relationship between impulse, momentum, and the direction of velocity resulting from the applied force. The need to determine the center of mass velocity, angular velocity, and the optimal distance for minimal displacement of the opposite side is emphasized. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing motion involving both rotation and translation.
benf.stokes
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have a rule of mass m and length l lying on a table without friction.

We give a boost I to the rule at a distance d from the center of mass so that it now has a rotation and a translation.

1) The rule rotates about which point?

2) Determine the velocity, vm, of the center of mass.

3) Determine the angular velocity, w, of the ruler.

4)What should be the distance d so that the instantaneous displacement ds of the oposite side of the ruler be a minimum?

Homework Equations



w=v*r
I= Variation momentum

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the answer to 1 is that it rotates about it center of mass but I don't have a clue about the other ones
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct on 1.

Another word for "boost I" is "impulse I". Does this mean something to you?
 
Yes impulse is the change in momentum but how do I know the direction of the resulting velocity?
 
Put a ruler on a table and give it a sharp flick with your finger. That's the impulse. In what direction is the impulse? In what direction does the ruler move?
 
benf.stokes said:
I think the answer to 1 is that it rotates about it center of mass but I don't have a clue about the other ones
I suspect they are asking about the instantaneous axis of rotation, which won't be the center of mass. (Since it's also translating.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top