Rotational Motion of a wheel turning

AI Thread Summary
A wheel accelerates counterclockwise at 1.2 rad/s² from rest, and the discussion focuses on calculating the time to complete 60 revolutions and the resulting rotational speed. The initial conversion of 1.2 rad/s² to 1.885 rev/s² is noted, but the importance of using standard constant acceleration equations for angular motion is emphasized. Participants suggest converting revolutions to radians for consistency in calculations. The equation ω²=ω₀²+2αθ is discussed, with a reminder to ensure unit compatibility before applying it. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in unit conversion and the correct application of angular motion formulas.
Falinox
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wheel starting from rest accelerates at 1.2 rad/s² counterclockwise.
A) How long does it take to turn through 60 revolutions?
B)What is the rotational speed at that time?

2. The attempt at a solution

I converted 1.2rad/s² to 1.885 rev/s² by dividing by 2πrad (2 pi radians).
So where can I go from here?

Once I find the time in part A I can use the fact that ω=Δθ/ΔT to find the "rotational speed" correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Falinox! Welcome to PF! :wink:
Falinox said:
I converted 1.2rad/s² to 1.885 rev/s² by dividing by 2πrad (2 pi radians).
So where can I go from here?

Once I find the time in part A I can use the fact that ω=Δθ/ΔT to find the "rotational speed" correct?

(btw, always leave a space between the number and the unit)

No, you need to use the standard constant acceleration equations, using angular displacement speed and acceleration instead of the linear versions. :smile:
 
and i suggest you use radians rather than revolutions; the equations look much nicer that way.
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi Falinox! Welcome to PF! :wink:(btw, always leave a space between the number and the unit)

No, you need to use the standard constant acceleration equations, using angular displacement speed and acceleration instead of the linear versions. :smile:


Thanks for the reply!

ω²=ω₀²+2αθ
Given: ω₀=0 rad/s, α=1.2 rad/s²

Is θ my 60 rev? (maybe convert 60 rev to rad?)
 
that is the right idea, and yes, theta=60rev, but make sure your units all match before plugging things in. your formula is only true if you use radians, so i would recommend that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top