Rotational Motion Problem (a bike)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the angular speed of a bicycle's rear wheel (Wr) and the angular speed of the pedals and front sprocket (Wf). The original poster seeks to derive a formula for the ratio Wr/Wf, considering the number of teeth on the front (Nf) and rear (Nr) sprockets, and evaluates this ratio with specific values for Nf and Nr.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations for angular velocity and the implications of substituting values related to the circumference and radius of the sprockets. There is an exploration of how the number of teeth affects the angular velocities and the relationships between the variables involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the original poster's approach, questioning certain substitutions and suggesting alternative ways to express the relationships between the variables. There is ongoing exploration of the correct formulation of the ratio Wr/Wf, with different perspectives on the relevance of the radius and number of teeth.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the uniform spacing of teeth on the sprockets and the relationship between angular velocity and linear velocity. Participants are also navigating the implications of their equations and the clarity of their reasoning.

Carpe Mori
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How is the angular speed of the rear wheel (Wr) of a bicycle related to that of the pedals and front sprocket (Wf)? That is derive a formula for Wr/Wf. Let Nf and Nr be the number of teeth on the front and rear sprockets respectively. The teeth are spaced equally on all sprockets so that the chain meshes properly. Then evaluate the ratio of Wr/Wf when fron and rear sprockets have 52 and 13 teeth respectively


Homework Equations



W = v/r

Circumference (c) = 2pi*r (i am not sure if this is relevant)

The Attempt at a Solution



v for both front and back sprocket is the same (note W is not)

Wf = v/Rf

Wr = v/Rr

Since distances between teeth are same in back and front:

C = 2pi*Rr/Nr = 2pi*Rf/Nf

so...

Wr = v/(Nr*Rf/Nf*Rr)

Wf = v/(Nf*Rr/Nr*Rf)

Wr/Wf = Nf^2*Rr^2/Nr^2*Rf^2

but i do not think that is right because the question implies that your only variable should be N...

HELP! (if i seem unclear about anything...do tell)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations for angular velocity look sound. I think your confusion starts when you substitute: C = 2pi*Rr/Nr. That to me doesn't make much sense. I would agree that the circumference C = kNr, where k is the spacing or pitch (some constant) of the teeth. And C is also equal to C=2pi*Rr. Which would lead to Rr being expressed in terms of Nr.

Give that a try.
 
mezarashi said:
Your equations for angular velocity look sound. I think your confusion starts when you substitute: C = 2pi*Rr/Nr. That to me doesn't make much sense.

Nr/(2pi*Rr) is just the number of teeth per unit length, and so would be the same on both. He has just taken the reciprocal, which is constant C.

Carpe Mori said:
Wr = v/(Nr*Rf/Nf*Rr)

Wf = v/(Nf*Rr/Nr*Rf)

Wr/Wf = Nf^2*Rr^2/Nr^2*Rf^2
What is all this? Number of teeth on each is proportional to the circumference and hence the radius. Find Wr/Wf as some ratio of Rr and Rf and then put Nr and Nf in the ratio.
 
well i took my C = 2pi*Rr/Nr = 2pi*Rf/Nf and solved for both Rr and Rf and then plugged those values into my initial angular velocity equations.

and i resulted with

Wr/Wf = Nf^2*Rr^2/Nr^2*Rf^2

is this correct yes or no?? it means angular velocity depends on both Radius and number of teeth of both sprockets...which makes sense to me
 
Carpe Mori said:
well i took my C = 2pi*Rr/Nr = 2pi*Rf/Nf and solved for both Rr and Rf and then plugged those values into my initial angular velocity equations.

and i resulted with

Wr/Wf = Nf^2*Rr^2/Nr^2*Rf^2

is this correct yes or no?? it means angular velocity depends on both Radius and number of teeth of both sprockets...which makes sense to me

I don't know. You check it once more. But I'll show you the easy and natural way.

v = Rf*Wf = Rr*Wr =>
Wf/Wr = Rr/Rf = 2pi*Rr/2pi*Rf = C*Nr/C*Nf = Nr/Nf =>
Wr/Wf = Nf/Nr.

There was no need to introduce the C, since it's obvious that the number of teeth is directly proportional to the radius.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K