Rotational to linear kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of rotational to linear kinetic energy for a hollow metal cylinder rolling off a roof. Participants clarify that the rotational kinetic energy is defined as KEr = 1/2 Iω², where I is the moment of inertia and ω is the angular velocity, which relates to linear velocity through the equation ω = v/r. It is established that while the cylinder's angular velocity remains constant after leaving the roof, its translational kinetic energy changes as it becomes a projectile. The final ratios calculated are 1:1 at the edge of the roof and 7:1 upon hitting the ground, indicating a significant increase in linear kinetic energy relative to rotational kinetic energy. The conversation emphasizes understanding the principles of energy conservation and motion dynamics in this context.
Daniiel
Messages
119
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 5kg hollow metal cylinder with a radius 0.1m rolls off the edge of a roof with an incline of 30degrees and height of 1metre.

If the cylinder was initially at rest, what is the ratio of the rotational to linear kinetic energy when it reaches the end of the roof?

and the ration when it hits the ground?


I don't understand what "The ratio of rotational to linear kinetic energy" means
does it mean the angular velocity? or the velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Daniiel said:
I don't understand what "The ratio of rotational to linear kinetic energy" means
does it mean the angular velocity? or the velocity?
I'm sure you know to find linear KE. It's just 1/2mv^2. How is rotational KE defined? How are they related? Hint: Assume it rolls without slipping.
 
so
KEr= 1/2 iw^2 (w being omega) and i(cylinder) = MR^2

do i plug in i = mr and then w = v/r? and make it = KE

i wrote it all out but it looked silly so i deleted it
is MR^2 the centre of mass of the cylinder? i read I = Icom + Mh^2
 
Daniiel said:
so
KEr= 1/2 iw^2 (w being omega) and i(cylinder) = MR^2
Good.

do i plug in i = mr and then w = v/r? and make it = KE
I don't understand what you're saying here. But w = v/r is the condition for rolling without slipping.


is MR^2 the centre of mass of the cylinder?
That's the rotational inertia about an axis through the center of mass, which is what you need.
i read I = Icom + Mh^2
That's the parallel axis theorem. Not needed here.
 
I think i understand now
I have to find the KE and KEr at the end of the slope, and show the difference as a ratio?

In air when it leaves the edge, would its angular velocity decrease? So i'd treat it as a projectile to find the time it takes to hit the ground and somhow find the angular velocity?
 
Daniiel said:
I think i understand now
I have to find the KE and KEr at the end of the slope, and show the difference as a ratio?
Right.

In air when it leaves the edge, would its angular velocity decrease?
What do you think? What's required for the angular velocity to change?
So i'd treat it as a projectile to find the time it takes to hit the ground and somhow find the angular velocity?
Yes. As soon as it leaves the roof, it's a projectile.
 
sorry for being a pest
i think, then over think, then make afew solutions, then have 0 confidence
at first i thought that in the air the angular velocity would decrease because there's no surface to roll on, but it'd be the angular acceleration decreasnig wouldn't it?
so the angular velocity doesn't change, so KEr is the same and and KE is different?
thanks for your patients ;)
 
Daniiel said:
at first i thought that in the air the angular velocity would decrease because there's no surface to roll on, but it'd be the angular acceleration decreasnig wouldn't it?
Not quite sure what you're saying here. Try and rephrase it.
so the angular velocity doesn't change, so KEr is the same and and KE is different?
That's true. Once it leaves the surface, there's no more friction to provide any torque, so the angular velocity--and thus rotational KE--doesn't change. Translational KE certainly does.
 
Thanks heaps for your help Doc Al.
I ended up getting for the edge of the roof the ratio 1:1 and then 7:1 7 being KE (linear)
Could i just double check my working in these two questions?
I prnt screened and wrote under the questions.
When i did the ski one i found the range of jump then found the t for that range, then halved t to find the highest point in the jump, and with that t found h

The other one seems to make sense, then smaller angle moves faster than the neutron at 60 degrees

Do you think i did it right?

[PLAIN]http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/8657/eeebb.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top