Routes to formation of a black hole?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores various routes to black hole formation, primarily focusing on high-mass stars that evolve off the main sequence and undergo supernovae, leaving behind black-hole remnants. Alternative mechanisms, such as accretion-induced collapse and neutron star mergers, are also considered, though they may be less common. The Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit is noted as the maximum mass for neutron stars, influencing their potential to collapse quietly or explosively. Evidence suggests that core collapse may be more complex than previously understood, with mergers likely being a significant formation pathway. Overall, the mechanisms of black hole formation remain an area of active research and debate.
bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
6,723
Reaction score
431
How many routes are there to the formation of a black hole? A high-mass star can evolve off the main sequence, then end up going supernova and leaving behind a black-hole remnant. In this thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3062281 , Radrook and Jim Graber pointed out that there may be mechanisms of collapse that don't involve a supernova. Jim suggested that I search on arxiv.org for "accretion induced collapse," and indeed there were about a gazillion hits. Can anyone sort this out at all? Is anything known about the possible mechanisms of formation of supermassive black holes? At lower masses, is there an accretion/collapse mechanism and a separate collision mechanism?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Let me give an off the top of my head simple approximation. In a way, it's all accretion. Indeed, the main route to black hole formation is still thought to be when a massive star burns out its fuel and collapses, or "accretes onto its own center" if you will. This is thought to lead to a supernova in most or all cases, but in a minority of cases it just might collapse with only a weak explosion, or no significant explosion at all. The second most common route is when a neutron star in a binary accretes matter from its companion until it exceeds the Chandrasekar limit. Again this is thought to lead to a supernova in some cases, but could lead to a quiet collapse in others. This is still at least somewhat controversial, AFAIK. A third, slightly different case is when two neutron stars merge either by slow inspiral or just possibly, very rarely, by direct collision in a dense environment such as the center of a globular cluster. Once again, there is a possibility of an explosion or a more or less quiet collapse. The calculations are difficult and the final results are still disputed, I think. If some of these alternate scenarios are actually realized, they will be far less common than the main routes. Opinions are still changing, but that's my outsiders take on the current state of play.

Jim Graber
 
Actually, that should be Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit, which is largest possible neutron star, rather than Chandrasekhar limit, which is largest possible white dwarf. Sorry.
Jim Graber
 
Thanks, Jim. That's very informative!
-Ben
 
Another unlikely but potential way a neutron star might collapse into a black hole is if a large neutron star has very high initial spin meaning the stars shape is an oblate spheroid and the volume of the star is greater than the same neutron star if it was static (the coordinate event horizon radius for a rotating star is also less than that of a static star). As the star slows done over millions of years, the interior density will increase as well the potential coordinate event horizon radius and there's a chance the star could collapse into a black hole, but the star would have to be on the brink of critical mass (~3 sol) with only the spin preventing collapse.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top