Russian Dolls Matryoshka Approach to Riemann Hypothesis

HermitianMonk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Well we know what matryoshka dolls are? Those nested dolls one inside another. I am a mere laymen and amateur that's why I am using descriptive terms instead of math rigor. So what should the approach be:

If RH nest Hilbert-Polya conjecture, then what things nest HP conjecture? And ad infinitum...

I chose HP conjecture because it seems to be the hottest thang right now since Montgomery's meeting with Dyson about eigenvalues of random Hermitian matrices corresponding to the zeros of RH...

Thus my questions are twofold:

1. An elaboration on Hilbert-Polya conjecture (I did do forum search!).
2. Are there further 'sub-sets' that are embedded in HP conjecture, proving which will in turn prove RH by moving all the cogwheels and gears?

Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HermitianMonk said:
I am a mere laymen and amateur that's why I am using descriptive terms instead of math rigor.

Being a layman is fine. Using descriptive terms instead of rigorous math... that's harder.

HermitianMonk said:
If RH nest Hilbert-Polya conjecture, then what things nest HP conjecture? And ad infinitum...

I take it by "nest" you mean "is/are implied by"?

HermitianMonk said:
2. Are there further 'sub-sets' that are embedded in HP conjecture, proving which will in turn prove RH by moving all the cogwheels and gears?

I don't know any.
 
from the functional point of view ,which is commont to both physicist and mathematicians

1. RH is equivalent to finding a Riemann surface whose geodesic lenghts are the primes , and the eigenvalues of its Laplacian are 1/4+it^2 , being 't' the imaginary part of the zeros

2. RH is equivalent to finding a chaotic Hamiltonian with length of closed orbits proportional to primes

3. RH and Hilbert-Polya approach are equivalent to finding a linear operator L so the Trace of U=exp(iuL) is related to exp(-u)d\Psi (e^u) here 'd' means teh derivative and Psi is teh Chebyshev function
 
zetafunction said:
2. RH is equivalent to finding a chaotic Hamiltonian with length of closed orbits proportional to primes

3. RH and Hilbert-Polya approach are equivalent to finding a linear operator L so the Trace of U=exp(iuL) is related to exp(-u)d\Psi (e^u) here 'd' means teh derivative and Psi is teh Chebyshev function

yeah these two I was interested in + Montgomery's pair correlation conjecture breakdown...
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
23K
Back
Top