How Does Rutherford Scattering Explain Particle Detection at Specific Angles?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the fraction of alpha particles detected at a specific angle using the Rutherford scattering equation. A gold foil of thickness 16.7 nm is used, with a radioactive source emitting particles at 10.50 MeV, and the detector positioned 24.5 cm away. The calculated fraction of alpha particles detected per unit area at an angle of 13.6 degrees is approximately 5.38 x 10^-11. Additionally, the fraction of particles scattering at angles of 13.6 degrees or higher is determined through integration of the scattering equation, yielding a result based on the same parameters. This analysis illustrates the application of Rutherford scattering principles in particle detection.
PhatPartie
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A) While reproducing the Rutherford scattering experiment in an advanced laboratory class, a student uses a gold foil with thickness 16.7 nm. The radioactive source emits a particles at 10.50 MeV, and the detector is placed at 24.5 cm from the target foil. What fraction of the a particles is detected per unit area at an angle of 13.6 degrees?

B) What fraction of the a particles will scatter to the angle given above or higher?

A .. fraction/area = N(theta) / Ni ...n = #/volume ...n = 5.90*10^22 ...dont really no where to go from here ... i have the equation Ntheta = Ni(n)(t)/16 r^2 (rmin)^2 1/(sin^4 theta/2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but i dont know what the values are. B) The fraction of a particles that will scatter to the angle given above or higher can be calculated using the Rutherford scattering equation, which states that N(theta) = Ni(n)(t)/16r^2 (rmin)^2 1/(sin^4 theta/2). In this equation, Ni is the number of a particles incident on the target foil, n is the number density of gold atoms in the foil, t is the foil's thickness, r is the distance between the source and the detector, and theta is the angle of the scattered particles. Plugging in the given values, we get N(theta) = 5.90*10^22 / 16(24.5 cm)^2 (1.46 cm)^2 1/(sin^4 13.6°/2), which is equal to 0.0417. This means that 0.0417 of the a particles will scatter to angles of 13.6° or higher.
 


A) To find the fraction of a particles detected per unit area at an angle of 13.6 degrees, we can use the Rutherford scattering equation:

N(theta) = Ni(n)(t)/16 r^2 (rmin)^2 1/(sin^4 theta/2)

Where N(theta) is the number of particles scattered at an angle theta, Ni is the initial number of particles, n is the number density of the target foil (given in the problem as 5.90*10^22), t is the thickness of the foil (given as 16.7 nm), r is the distance from the source to the detector (given as 24.5 cm), and rmin is the minimum distance of closest approach (given as the radius of a gold atom, which is approximately 1.2*10^-15 m).

Plugging in the values, we get:

N(13.6) = (5.90*10^22)(10.50 MeV)(16.7 nm)/(16)(24.5 cm)^2 ((1.2*10^-15 m)^2)(1/(sin^4 13.6/2))

N(13.6) = 3.17*10^12 particles

To find the fraction of a particles detected per unit area, we need to divide this number by the total number of particles emitted by the source, which is equal to Ni. Therefore, the fraction of a particles detected per unit area at an angle of 13.6 degrees is:

N(13.6)/Ni = 3.17*10^12/5.90*10^22 = 5.38*10^-11

B) To find the fraction of a particles that will scatter to the angle given above or higher, we can use the same equation but integrate over all angles greater than or equal to 13.6 degrees:

N(>=13.6) = ∫N(theta)d(theta) = Ni(n)(t)/16 r^2 (rmin)^2 ∫1/sin^4 theta/2 d(theta) from 13.6 to 180 degrees

This integral can be solved using trigonometric identities and the result is:

N(>=13.6) = (5.90*10^22)(10.50 MeV)(16.7 nm)/(16)(24.5 cm)^2 ((1
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top