Rutherford's 1911 Experiment: Electric Field & Deflection Formula

D.Hilbert
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My question is about the famous paper by E. Rutherford on the scattering of alpha particles (1911). The paper is easy to find on internet. Rutherford gives the formula for the electric field inside an atom, at a distance r from the nucleus (here reduced to a point):

X = N e (1/r^2 - r/R^3)

Here N e in the electric charge in the nucleus and R is the radius of the atom. After he says

It is not difficult to show that the deflection (supposed small) of an electrified particle due to this field is given by

theta = b/p (1 - p^2/R^2)^(3/2)

where p is the perpendicular from the center on the path.

I can obtain X but I don't see where the formula for theta comes from.

Any suggestion?

Thanks DH
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I were old Ernest, I would integrate the vertical component of the force over the section of the trajectory through the nucleus. If theta is small enough, pretending it is straight may be OK, and it's easier.
 
Hi,
Thanks for the answer.
Let the trajectory of the alpha particle be on the x-axis.

Are you suggesting to calculate

\int_{t1}^{t2} Fy dt

where Fy is the y-coordinate of the force?

DH
 
I found Rutherford-1911 where your formulas feature. There also is an explanation of what b stands for, which you would have included in your problem statement if you would have used the template. Please use it from now on. PF has a simple rule: no template, no assistance. It would have saved me some time that I could have used for others. Now I have to do some errands, so I am short on time.

But yes, (read: atom in my post, the nucleus is considered pointlike, somewhat incongruent in this context: it still had to be discovered. Better to speak of the center of the atom, but never mind). t1 and t2 can be related to R and p and the speed of the ##\alpha##. So you change from dt to dx. Some ##\beta## comes in with ## \sin\beta = {x\over R}##; perhaps you go from dx to d##\beta##. All constants go into b and there you are!
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top