Σ and ∏ bonds and hybridization

AI Thread Summary
Hybridization theory explains the formation of equivalent bonds in molecules like CH4 by mixing atomic orbitals, resulting in hybrid orbitals such as sp3. This approach addresses discrepancies in bond lengths and angles predicted by earlier models, which suggested that individual s and p orbitals formed bonds independently. In hybridization, when bonds overlap head-on, they form σ bonds, while parallel overlaps create ∏ bonds. The theory enhances understanding of molecular geometry and bonding characteristics, aligning with observed molecular structures. Additionally, the discussion touches on the differences between valence bond theory and molecular orbital (MO) theory, emphasizing the importance of hybridization in accurately describing molecular bonding.
member 392791
I am having difficulties understanding the concept of hybridization and the σ and ∏ bonds. My current understanding is that basically you just mix up a p and s orbital and it gives you an sp orbital, and if the bonds touch they are σ bonds, and if the bonds are parallel the are ∏ bonds. I don't see the motive for this theory or what the upshot of all this mumbo jumbo is. Can anyone help clarify? Same with valence bond theory vs. MO theory
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hybridization theory was brought in because when you viewed a CH4 molecule, you'd see all the C-H bonds had equal bond lengths and equal angles between them. The original theory of each orbital making its own bond with the other did not yield this, since, s-s, s-p, formed in CH4 would be of different lengths. So basically, to make the theory in acceptance of the observed details, this new idea was introduced.

Now with this hybrid theory, you get 4 of s-p bonds which was decided to be called sp3 as one s and 3 p are involved.

This might also be helpful to get a broader picture,
http://chemistry.boisestate.edu/people/richardbanks/inorganic/bonding%20and%20hybridization/bonding_hybridization.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top