S = k ln W : ln : From Both Multiplicity and Integral ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the natural logarithm in the statistical mechanics formulation of entropy, S = k ln W, can be derived from both multiplicity and an integral perspective. It emphasizes that the total entropy of two interacting systems is the sum of their individual entropies, represented as Stotal = k ln(WA * WB) = SA + SB. The conversation also connects thermodynamic entropy to the integral form, specifically through the relationship delta S = k ln(W2/W1), which relates to the equation delta Q/T = nR ln(v2/v1). The question posed is whether the term ln(W2/W1) can be viewed as an integral property from W1 to W2. Overall, the discussion highlights the interplay between multiplicity and integral formulations in understanding entropy.
morrobay
Gold Member
Messages
1,116
Reaction score
1,693
Can the natural logarithm in the statistical mechanics formulation of entropy , S = k ln W be based on both multiplicity and an integral ? The extensive property and multiplicity explanation : That for any given macrostate , the total entropy of two interacting
systems is the sum of their individual entropies:
Stotal = k ln( WA WB)
= k ln WA + k ln WB = SA + SB
For the natural logarithm to be based on the integral : x1 to x2 1/x dx = ln x2/x1
That the thermodynamic entropy is based on : delta Q /T = n R ln v2/v1
http://www.eoht.info/page/S+=+k+ln+W on page 2 of this link
W2/W1 = v2/v1 are equated. In a physical chemistry text delta S = k ln W2/W1
So is this term , ln W2/W1, the property of the integral : from W1 to W2 dw/1/W ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Back
Top