When was the quasar formed in relation to the Big Bang?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lol_nl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a quasar relative to Earth and determining its formation time in relation to the Big Bang. The initial calculations utilize the Doppler effect to find the quasar's speed and explore time dilation to ascertain when the quasar formed. The participant grapples with the complexities of special relativity, particularly in expressing elapsed time between the quasar and Earth. They ultimately arrive at a formation time of approximately 7.1 billion years, but encounter discrepancies in their lifespan calculations. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying relativistic concepts to cosmic phenomena and the importance of accurate wavelength interpretation.
lol_nl
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(my own translation)

Light with a wavelength of 360 nm emitted from a quasar is observed as light with a wavelength of 120 nm on earth.
a) Calculate the speed of the quasar relative to the earth.

The universe is approx. 16 * 10^9 yrs old in the Earth system. Assume that all the material exploded into the universe with the Big Bang. Throughout the years the separate pieces of material from the quasar merged to formed the quasar. Assume that all these separate pieces have been traveling with the same speed as the quasar, relative to the earth. Assume that light from the quasar has just reached the earth.

b) Calculate when the quasar was formed in the Earth system.

Assume that the quasar has a lifetime of about 1.0 * 10^6 yrs in the system of the quasar.

c) Calculate how many years light from the quasar will be visible on earth.


Homework Equations


It's my first attempt at solving a more complex special relativity problem and I have a very basic knowledge of it. But I know the basic equations of time dilation, length contraction, doppler effect, relativistic speed that seem relevant.


The Attempt at a Solution



a) is simple and can easily be solved using the Doppler equation.

I'm getting stuck at b). I have drawn some diagrams and tried to understand the situation, but I can't make head nor tail out of it. Can you express the time expired since the BB in the quasar system using time dilation? If so, how can you possibly find out when the quasar was formed?

I only have a slight idea for c).
Using time dilation one can calculate the lifespan of the quasar in the Earth system. Then just add that to the time when the quasar was formed. You'll need the answer from b). The time it takes the light from the quasar to reach the Earth is the time between the formation of the quasar and now. So if you count that up you get simply the lifetime of the quasar in the Earth system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
b/ In the Big Bang, material condensed at a very small "point" explodes, so everything starts to move at the same place. Take t=0 when the explosion takes places. Consider the Earth's frame. When the materials merge into the quasar, it has gone away from the Earth a distance d=vT, where T is the time when the quasar is formed. At this point, the quasar emits radiation towards the Earth, and it takes T_{light} = d/c = vT/c for the radiation to come to the Earth. At the time when the light reaches the Earth, t=T+T_{light}, which is also the age of the Universe, as the problem assumes that light from the quasar has just reached the earth. You have v, c and the Universe's age, you can solve for T :smile:

c/ Now you have the lifespan of quasar in the Earth's frame, say T_{quasar}. Imagine that at t=T, the quasar, at a distance d, emits its first radiation, and at t=T+T_{quasar}, it, at a distance d', emits its last one. Calculate d' and solve for the difference in time taken for lights in the 2 times to reach the Earth.
 
Thanks! I think I'm getting what you mean, thought putting it on paper is a little harder :).
I'll figure out how to use LaTeX so I can post some my calculations next time.

For b, the only thing I kept confusing about was the sign of v. I know that the quasar is moving toward the Earth from a). Eventually I could see from my calculation that I would get a value of T greater than t if I took v as negative, so I took it as positive :).
Eventually I got a value of 7.1*10^8 years which is the same as that he answer sheet.

I thought I had c as well, but it turns out my answer is different from that of answer sheet. Turns out I misunderstood something.
Here's roughly what I did (rounded off answers):

Tquasar = (gamma) * Tquasar' (Tquasar' = 1.0 * 10^6)
d = 7.1 *10^8 light years
d - d' = v*Tquasar = 2.2*10^6 light years
(d' < d because the quasar is coming toward the earth)
Tlight2 = d'/c = 8.86 * 10^8 years
Te = T + Tquasar + Tlight2 - t = 5.56 * 10^5 years

Now the answer says 3*10^6 years.

It's a bit unclear if I write it down like this I guess. I'll get LaTeX soon.
 
Hmm now you mention it. I didn't notice the wavelengths. I thought the quasar should move away from the Earth, because the pieces also move away from the Earth. It should produce redshift instead. Quite weird! And the ratio of the wavelengths implies a very large speed!

I haven't checked the numbers yet, but I see something strange in your calculation:
d = 7.1 *10^8 light years
...
...
Tlight2 = d'/c = 8.86 * 10^8 years
You eventually got d'>d?
 
Thanks. I found the solutions to the problems. C is actually much simpler if you consider the time in the quasar system. If you calculate the time when the quasar was formed in its own system and then write an expression for the time that passed in the quasar system in terms of the time that passed in the Earth system, you can equate that to the quasar lifespan and then solve for the time that passed in the Earth system. But thanks anyway :)!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top