Sakurai 1.27 - Transformation Operators

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Suppose that f(A) is a function of a Hermitian operator A with the property A|a'\rangle = a'|a'\rangle. Evaluate \langle b''|f(A)|b'\rangle when the transformation matrix from the a' basis to the b' basis is known.The attempt at a solution
Here's what I have... I'm not sure if the last step is correct, but apart from that, I'm sure everything else is right. So,

\langle b''|A|b'\rangle = \sum_{a'} \sum_{a''} \langle b'' | a'' \rangle \langle a'' | A | a' \rangle \langle a' | b' \rangle
= \sum_{a'} \sum_{a''} \delta(a'-a'') a' \langle b'' | a'' \rangle \langle a' | b' \rangle
= \sum_{a'} a' \langle b'' | a' \rangle \langle a' | b' \rangle

And then I said that the above was

= a' \langle b'' | b' \rangle = a' \delta(b' - b'') \Leftrightarrow \langle b'' | f(A) | b' \rangle = f(a') \delta(b' - b'')

where a' was the eigenvalue of corresponding eigenket to b'.

Is the last step correct? That was the only part I was a bit shaky on... there is an a' index inside the summation...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that, while your first step is correct, you can do better than that. I suggest that you think of an even better first step which will obviate your suspect final step.

BTW, your problem statement did not specify that the inner product is the Dirac delta. Is this stated somewhere else?
 
It's the Dirac delta because they're eigenkets of some operator (okay well to make the argument more rigorous, the eigenkets a and b are eigenkets of some Hermitian operator where there is no degeneracy).
 
Domnu said:
It's the Dirac delta because they're eigenkets of some operator (okay well to make the argument more rigorous, the eigenkets a and b are eigenkets of some Hermitian operator where there is no degeneracy).
This remains insufficient to determine that \langle{}a'|a''\rangle=\delta\left(a'-a''\right), etc.. But, at any rate, you can avoid this issue entirely (see my previous post).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top