Salt Shaker on a Lazy Susan, magnitude of force

AI Thread Summary
Joey's experiment with the lazy Susan involves spinning a salt shaker at the edge to keep it from slipping off, achieving a speed of 0.6908 m/s with a radius of 0.22 m. To determine the magnitude of the horizontal contact force on the shaker, one must calculate the centripetal acceleration, which is essential for an object moving in a circular path. The centripetal acceleration can be expressed as a = v²/r, where v is the speed and r is the radius. With the mass of the shaker measured at 87 grams, the next step involves applying Newton's second law to find the force. Understanding these principles will help solve the problem effectively.
libbylicious1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Mischievous Joey likes to play with his family's lazy susan (this drives Mom crazy because it is an antique). He puts the salt shaker near the edge and tries to spin the tray at a speed so that the shaker just barely goes around without slipping off. Joey finds that the shaker just barely stays on when the turntable is making one complete turn every two seconds. Joey's older sister measures the mass of the shaker to be 87 grams. She also measures the radius of the turntable to be 0.22 m, and she is able to calculate that the speed of the shaker as it successfully goes around in a circle is 0.6908 m/s.

What is the magnitude of the horizontal part of the contact force on the shaker by the turntable?i am so lost, can someone please help me to get this problem started?? i thought i needed to find the acceleration of the salt shaker and used 0 as my starting velocity, but when i went to find the force i didnt come up with the right answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A body moving at uniform speed in a circle must have a centripetal acc.
Do you know the expression for this acc?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top