Satellite Orbit Problem what am I doing wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter heyitslars
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit Satellite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving a spacecraft in a low lunar orbit, where the user seeks help calculating its speed. The user initially applies the formula v = √(G * M / R) but miscalculates due to unit conversion errors, particularly between kilometers and meters. Despite using the equation mg = mv²/R, the user arrives at the same incorrect speed of 52.9 m/s. Key advice emphasizes the importance of maintaining consistent units throughout calculations, particularly with the gravitational constant G. Accurate unit handling is crucial for solving orbital mechanics problems effectively.
heyitslars
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a satellite orbit problem I'm not quite understanding...any help would be appreciated.

Homework Statement



Suppose a spacecraft orbits the moon in a very low, circular orbit, just a few hundred meters above the lunar surface. The moon has a diameter of 3500 km, and the free-fall acceleration at the surface is 1.60 m/s^2.

Homework Equations



1. How fast is this spacecraft moving?

The Attempt at a Solution



To find the speed, I used the equation v= square root of (G X M/R), with M being the mass of the moon (I had to look that up) and G being the gravitational constant.

v= square root of (6.674E-11)(7.36E22/1750)=52980.125=>52.9 m/s

The answer I got was an available option under the answer choices; however, I got it wrong. I can't figure out another way to come up with the velocity.

I also tried using the equation mg=mv^2/R; however, I got the same number as before.
m's cancel;
g=v^2/R
v= square root of g*R
Acceleration = g in freefall
V = square root of 1.60*1750km=>52.9 m/s

Both of these answers are incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Watch your units! Kilometers and meters are not the same.
 
Didn't I convert between them? For the first equation I used, 52980.125 is in kilometers, then I moved the decimals 3 places over to convert to meters.
 
No, it is not. It is in goofy units. G is not just a number, and you used it is such. It has units. You used G=6.674E-11, more correctly, G=6.674×10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top