Satellite Velocity Homework: Calculate Distance, Acceleration, and Speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary parameters for a satellite orbiting Earth at a gravitational field strength of 4.5 N/kg. The calculated altitude for the satellite's orbit is approximately 3.0 million meters above Earth's surface. For acceleration, participants suggest that 4.5 N/kg translates to an acceleration of 4.5 m/s², but there is confusion regarding the direction of this acceleration, which is towards Earth. The speed required for the satellite's orbit was recalculated to be approximately 6509.68 m/s after correcting a mistake in the square root calculation. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of orbital mechanics and the need for accurate calculations and understanding of gravitational forces.
AClass
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A satellite is designed to orbit Earth at an altitude above its surface that will place it in a gravitational field with a strength of 4.5 N/kg.

a) Calculate the distance above the surface of Earth at which the satellite must orbit.

b)Assuming the orbit is circular, calculate the acceleration of the satellite and its direction.

c)At what speed must the satellite travel in order to maintain this orbit?

mass of Earth : 5.98 x 10^24 kg
radius of the Earth : 6.38 x 10^6 m

Homework Equations



Fg= G mE / r^2
ac=v^2/r
v= sqrt ( GmE/r )
ac= 4Pi^2 r / T^2


The Attempt at a Solution



a)
4.5N/Kg=G(5.98x10^24kg)/r^2

r=9.4168x10^6m

h=re-r=3.0x10^6

Distance above the surface at which the satellite must orbit is 3.0x10^6m.

b)

No clue, I have searched many resources and they fail to give any clear ideas on how to tackle this question.

c)

Using

v=sqt(GMe/r)
v=sqt(G(5.98x10^24kg)/9.4168x10^6)
v=6.5097x10^6 m/s

Seems a bit too much. Could someone verify c) and I would appreciated any help with b), also verification of a) but I think I got it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AClass said:
v=sqt(GMe/r)
v=sqt(G(5.98x10^24kg)/9.4168x10^6)
v=6.5097x10^6 m/s

Seems a bit too much. Could someone verify c) and I would appreciated any help with b), also verification of a) but I think I got it.

Check your math for (c). You may have slipped up on the exponents.

For (b), consider N/kg by another name...
 
gneill said:
Check your math for (c). You may have slipped up on the exponents.

For (b), consider N/kg by another name...

c)
v=sqt(GMe/r)
v=sqt(G(5.98x10^24kg)/9.4168x10^6)
v=6509.6776m/s
I had forgotten to take the square root.

for b)

Other sources suggested that 4.5N/Kg is equal to 4.5m/s^2, that being its only acceleration. Seems that someone else who has taken my course before had confirmed that 4.5m/s^2 is not the correct acceleration.

I believe finding the acceleration from centreifual, and circular motions is my best bet.

However, I'm limited in terms of variables.
 
I suspect that 'other sources' failed to provide a direction for the acceleration.
 
gneill said:
I suspect that 'other sources' failed to provide a direction for the acceleration.

Yes, they failed to provide a direction. All that was explained is in the direction towards the earth.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top