Scalar and vector potentials and magnetic monopoles

peterjaybee
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write down expressions oer E and B fields in terms of \varphi and \bar{A}. Demonstrate that this definition of B is consistent with the non-existence of magnetic monopoles.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The first part of the question is easy. i.e. bookwork
B = \nabla \times \bar{A}
E = \nabla\varphi - \frac{\partial{A}}{\partial t}\

I don't know how to approach the second part of the question though
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
peterjaybee said:
Write down expressions oer E and B fields in terms of \varphi and \bar{A}. Demonstrate that this definition of B is consistent with the non-existence of magnetic monopoles.

Hi peterjaybee! :smile:

Hint: there is electric charge, but (if there are no magnetic monopoles) there's no magnetic charge (ie, you can't have a particle or an object with overall magnetic charge) … so how does electric charge come out of the equations in a way that magnetic charge can't? :wink:
 
I believe you're missing a minus sign for the E-field. Grab your book and go to the page where the Maxwell equations are listed. Can you identify the equation that has electric charge as a source term?
 
thanks, yes you are right the minus sign should be there.

With regards to the second part, i think I have it thanks to your hints. Div B = 0 is the maxwell eqn that shows there are no magnetic monopoles (as there are no source terms - unlike for div E). The definition of the vector potential is consistent with this because the divergence of a curl is always zero.
 
Yes that is correct.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top