Scalar potential of a function F, stuck on curl(F) = 0

Adyssa
Messages
202
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I have a function F defined in a slightly strange way, and I'm not asked to test if curl(F) == 0, but I thought I would do this as part of my working out. Lo and behold, it looks like it doesn't == 0, and this means, as far as I know, that there is no scalar potential but I'm quite sure that this is not correct.

Homework Equations



F = e^yz (1, xz, xy)

The Attempt at a Solution



I multiplied the e^yz factor to each part of the function

F = (e^yz, e^yz . xz, e^yz . xy)

Then I perform the cross product of the gradient operator and the function F (dx, dy, dz are partial derivatives, please excuse my notation)

Code:
|    i           j               k         |
|   dx         dy             dz        |
| e^yz  (e^yz . xz)  (e^yz . xy) |

= (z.e^yz .x - y.e^yz .x) - (e^yz .y - e^yz) + (e^yz .x - z.e^yz) != 0

am I correct in my partial differentiation of (for example) d/dy e^yz = ze^yz - I'm treating z as a constant and using the chain rule?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adyssa said:

Homework Statement



I have a function F defined in a slightly strange way, and I'm not asked to test if curl(F) == 0, but I thought I would do this as part of my working out. Lo and behold, it looks like it doesn't == 0, and this means, as far as I know, that there is no scalar potential but I'm quite sure that this is not correct.

Homework Equations



F = e^yz (1, xz, xy)

The Attempt at a Solution



I multiplied the e^yz factor to each part of the function

F = (e^yz, e^yz . xz, e^yz . xy)

Then I perform the cross product of the gradient operator and the function F (dx, dy, dz are partial derivatives, please excuse my notation)

Code:
|    i           j               k         |
|   dx         dy             dz        |
| e^yz  (e^yz . xz)  (e^yz . xy) |

= (z.e^yz .x - y.e^yz .x) - (e^yz .y - e^yz) + (e^yz .x - z.e^yz) != 0

am I correct in my partial differentiation of (for example) d/dy e^yz = ze^yz - I'm treating z as a constant and using the chain rule?

I don't think you are using the product rule correctly. If you differentiating (e^yz)(xy) you need to apply the product rule (fg)'=f'g+fg'.
 
Dick said:
I don't think you are using the product rule correctly. If you're differentiating e^(yz)(xy), you need to apply the product rule (fg)'=f'g+fg'.
In other words,
\displaystyle \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(e^{yz} xy\right)=\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial y}e^{yz}\right)xy+e^{yz}\left(\frac{\partial}{ \partial y}xy\right)\,.
Etc.
 
Facepalm! Yep, that will do it, thanks for the tip.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top