Scalars, vectors, pseudo-scalars, pseudo-vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter captain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalars Vectors
captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
This is a basic question about the scalars, vectors, pseudo-scalars, and pseudo-vectors. I know that scalars and pseudo-vectors don't change sign under parity and vectors and pseudo-scalars do, but does that imply that scalars have to be even function of x, y, z (like for example x^2+y^4+z^2) and pseudo scalars have to be odd in x, y, z and also correspondingly with vectors and pseudo vectors? Also if you have a function like x^3 +y^2+z^54, does that mean that this function can be broken up into a scalar and pseudo scalar part, just like how any function can be broken up into an even and an odd part? I think I am really confused about this. Thanks in advance to anyone who can really clarify this. (Also I didn't know where to post this question. So if its placed in the wrong section, then feel free to redirect it into the correct section.)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi captain! :smile:

Just as you can't add scalars to vectors,

you can't add vectors to pseudovectors, or scalars to pseudoscalars.

In physics, it'll be a scalar or a vector or a pseudo-scalar or a pseudo-vector …

it won't be a mixture. :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top