Scaled" & "Inverted" in Picoammeter Analog Voltage Output

AI Thread Summary
In the context of picoammeter analog voltage output, "scaled" refers to the adjustment of the voltage output to correspond with a specific measurement range, allowing accurate interpretation of the current being measured. For example, a picoammeter may scale a current of 2 mA to a voltage output of 2 V. "Inverted" indicates that the polarity of the voltage output is reversed, meaning a positive voltage output corresponds to a negative current, which aligns with oscilloscope input requirements. This scaling and inversion facilitate easier and more precise analysis of current measurements on an oscilloscope. Understanding these terms is crucial for effectively utilizing the picoammeter in electronic measurements.
ThereIam
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Meaning of "Scaled" and "Inverted" in context of picoammeter analog voltage output

I'm trying connect a picoammeter to an oscilloscope, and I noticed that its analog voltage output was described as "scaled" and "inverted". I'm just curious as to what that means about the oscilloscope is going to "see".

Very new to electronics, and cursory google searched yielded many pages using the adjectives "scaled" and "inverted" but all with the assumption that I knew what they meant.

What do they mean? What is the signal scaled to, and what does the fact that it's inverted imply about how its processing the current measurements...?

If that question even makes sense.

Thanks much.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Well, I think I figured out the "scaled" part. The ammeter scales the current measured in the range of 2mA to -2mA to the voltage output range of 2V to -2V.

I think.

It's not particularly helpful for me because I'm measuring a current of about 3 pA and looking for fluctuations on that scale, so the output would vary by a part in a billion... Guess I'll have to use an amplifier.
 


i thinnk it's scaled to represent whatever scale is selected.

I hail from the days of analog
where the instrument had a nice big analog meter driven by an amplifier
and a rotary switch to select the scale.
In those days the analog output represented the ends of the meter
for whichever scale you had selected.

so on a 2 pa scale , 2v would be 2 picoamps
and on a 2 amp scale 2v would be 2 amps

I'd be astonished if the digital meter were different
that's the whole reason for the analog output so you can record an expanded scale
and surely the range information is on one of the ports, rs232 or ieee488

read your manual carefully.
 


Thanks Jim, and yeah, you're right. It does scale with the scale, so to speak.
 


Scaled in this context means that the voltage output of the picoammeter has been adjusted or calibrated to a specific scale. This could be in terms of voltage, current, or another unit of measurement. This is important because it allows the user to accurately interpret the voltage output and relate it to the actual current being measured.

Inverted means that the polarity of the voltage output has been reversed. This means that a positive voltage output will correspond to a negative current and vice versa. This is commonly done to match the input requirements of the oscilloscope, as most oscilloscopes have a default setting for positive voltages.

In terms of how this affects the processing of current measurements, it simply means that the picoammeter is converting the current into a voltage output that is scaled and inverted for easier interpretation by the user. This allows for more precise and accurate measurements to be taken and analyzed on the oscilloscope.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top