Scaling factor of a mass spring system

AI Thread Summary
A mass spring system with a mass of 0.4kg resonates at 15Hz, and the goal is to determine the additional mass needed to lower the resonant frequency to 10Hz. The relevant equations involve the period of oscillation, T, which is related to mass (m) and spring constant (k). The spring constant remains unchanged between the two scenarios, and the correct approach involves rearranging the equations to isolate the variable mass. After some algebraic manipulation, it is determined that adding 0.5kg achieves the desired frequency. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the relationship between frequency and period in oscillatory systems.
mrcotton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass spring system carries a mass of 0.4kg. When the point of suspension is made to vibrate verticaly at a frequency of 15Hz resonance occurs. What mass should be added to the 0.4kg in order to reduce the resonant frequency to 10Hz.

a) 0.20kg
b) 0.40kg
c) 0.50kg
d) 0.60kg

Homework Equations



T=2∏√(m/k)
15=2∏√(0.4/k)

The Attempt at a Solution



15=2∏√(0.4/k)
10=2∏√(0.4+x/k)

Do I rearrange these so I have all the constants on the rhs then equate the lhs and solve for x if that makes sense?
Any help appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It wouldn't really make sense to try to 'put all the constants on the RHS of the equation' - everything in the first equation is a constant and we know that 'x', the only variable in the second equation, cannot be zero.

Consider, instead, that 'k', as a property of the spring, will not change between the two scenarios.

EDIT: Oh, and 'T' represents the period of oscillation rather than the frequency.
 
JayneDoe said:
It wouldn't really make sense to try to 'put all the constants on the RHS of the equation' - everything in the first equation is a constant and we know that 'x', the only variable in the second equation, cannot be zero.

Consider, instead, that 'k', as a property of the spring, will not change between the two scenarios.

EDIT: Oh, and 'T' represents the period of oscillation rather than the frequency.

I just realized the T=1/f mistake
Thanks for the help
 
0.06=2∏√(0.4/k)
0.1=2∏√(0.4+x/k)

So I still can't seem to get 0.5 out of the rearrangement and equation of the two formula.
 
I'm able to get x=0.5kg by that method, actually. If you leave '1/15' on the LHS of the first equation rather than approximating it as '0.06', you should find the same.
 
Thanks for the help,
I love the techniques of physics.
I got lost in the algebra

shm_zpsfa23b8c6.jpg
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top