Schrodinger Equation Explained - Get the Answer Now

Mech-Master
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I am trying to understand where did this equation exactly come from. I know it is very complex, but anyone can explain it to me in the best way possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jtbell said:
Do you mean, how did Schrödinger come up with the equation in the first place?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=418069#post418069

Yes please. I think most people who are trying to learn QM want to ask that question. In most Physics textbooks, it's just mentioned that it can't be proved. But are there any plausible explanations as to how the guy came up wit that equation?
 
Well, of course it can't be proven - this is physics, not pure math.

But IIRC, Schrödinger made some assumptions but basically 'guessed it'. It was first later that it was derived more rigorously from more basic postulates. This is covered in some more advanced QM textbooks (e.g. first chapter of Landau-Lifschitz)

I'm embarrassed I can't remember it all, but you assume a system is described by a wave function, which is continuous, square-integrable and normalized. That the observable properties of the system correspond to eigenvalues of Hermitian operators on that wave function, etc.
(What've I forgotten?)
 
Gaelilean symmetries: spatial and temporal translational invariance, stuff like that. See e.g. the book by Ballentine.
 
The whole process, including the historical context, is described in Valentini and Bacciagaluppi's recent book, available online here:

http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609184"

or on Amazon if you want to buy it.

See section 2.3 p.57 onwards. The relevant bit starts "On 3rd November 1925, Schroedinger wrote to Einstein: 'A few days ago I read with the greatest interest the ingenious thesis of Louis de Broglie...'"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top