Schrodinger equation for close and opens system

brajeshbeec
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do we differentiate the solution of Schrodinger equation for closed and open system.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

The Schrödinger equation is the same. But for an open system, you have to solve it using the density matrix, whereas for a closed system you usually can solve it for the wave function itself.
 
DrClaude said:
The Schrödinger equation is the same. But for an open system, you have to solve it using the density matrix [...]
I wouldn't put it that way. The term "Schrödinger equation" should be reserved for closed systems with their unitarian dynamics where no dissipation and decoherence occur.
 
kith said:
I wouldn't put it that way. The term "Schrödinger equation" should be reserved for closed systems with their unitarian dynamics where no dissipation and decoherence occur.

I'm not sure that I agree with you, but I did misspeak in my previous post. The time evolution of density matrix is governed by the Liouville-von Neumann equation
$$
i \hbar \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \left[ \hat{H}, \rho \right]
$$
That said, you can also approximate an open system using a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and use that in the Schrödinger equation, and have a non-unitary evolution of the wave function.
 
DrClaude said:
That said, you can also approximate an open system using a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and use that in the Schrödinger equation, and have a non-unitary evolution of the wave function.
True, I didn't think about this. But you will only get dissipation with this, not decoherence. This doesn't change if you use the von Neumann equation (which is derived from the Schrödinger equation). Pure states are still mapped to pure states and the entropy doesn't change.

In order to take into account all effects in open systems you need more general dynamical equations like the Lindblad equation. Compared with the von Neumann equation it has an additional term D(ρ) which induces dissipation and decoherence. I think it's also more natural than using non-hermitian Hamiltonians because you can derive it from the unitarian dynamics of the combined system "open system + environment" under certain assumptions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
143
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
717
Back
Top