Schrodinger equation for potential drop

cep
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello! I'm looking at a situation where there is a finite potential Vo for x<0, but zero potential for x>0. For a particle moving from left to right, I'm wondering what coefficients for the solution to the Schrodinger equation are equal to zero, and also how to prove that there is reflection even for a potential drop. hbar is h/(2π).

Homework Equations



Time-independent Schrodinger equation

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking:

For x<0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k0)(Arighteik0x+Alefte-ik0x)
where k0 = √[2m(E+Vo)/hbar2]

For x>0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k1)(Brighteik1x+Blefte-ik1x)
where k1 = √[2m(E)/hbar2]

I think that Bleft is zero, as there is nothing to cause reflection past the potential drop. How can I prove this, and that Aleft is non-zero (ie, potential drop produces reflection)? I know that the wave function and its derivative must be continuous at x=0-- is that sufficient?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, it lost the sub/superscripts. Here are the rewritten equations

For x<0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k0)*(Arighteik0x+Alefte-ik0x)
where k0 = √[2m(E+Vo)/hbar2]

For x>0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k1)*(Brighteik1x+Blefte-ik1x)
where k1 = √[2m(E)/hbar2]
 
There's nothing to prove. Just state the reason you gave for why Bleft=0. That's enough.
 
... really? I'm skeptical-- the problem asks for a proof.
 
*proof that a potential drop causes reflection, not proof of which coefficient is zero.
 
If you know that B-left is 0 then you know what the form of the equation is on the right side (x>0)

Now its just a boundary condition problem. you need to find A-left and A-right so that the two equations match up at x = 0. Set the two equations equal to each other at x = 0 and also set their derivates to be equal at x = 0. Then its just 2 equations 2 unknowns.

You should find that for the two equations to match up A-left cannot be 0 and there's your proof of reflection
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top