Here is a question from problem 26 part a on page 246 of "A First Course in GR" by Schutz. I doubt that it can be answered by someone without a copy of the book, but I have thought that before and been wrong. If someone without the book wants to help and needs more information then of course I would promptly provide it.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Eq. (9.58) in the vacuum region outside the source - i.e., where [itex]S_{\mu \nu} = 0[/itex] - can be solved by separation of variables.

Eq (9.58) (edited) follows:

[tex]

(\nabla^2 + \Omega^2)(\bar{h}_{\mu \nu}e^{i\Omega t}) = 0

[/tex]

Assume a solution for [itex]\bar{h}_{\mu \nu}[/itex] has the form

[tex]

\Sigma_{km}A^{km}_{\mu \nu}f_k(r)Y_{km}(\theta, \phi)/\sqrt{r}

[/tex]

where [itex]Y_{km}[/itex] is the spherical harmonic. (The book uses l as does everyone else on the planet, but I changed l to k so that this post would read more easily).

(a) Show that [itex]f_k(r)[/itex] satisfies the equation:

[tex]

\ddot{f}_k + \frac{1}{r}\dot{f}_k + [\Omega^2 - \frac{(k+\frac{1}{2})^2}{r^2}]f_k = 0

[/tex]

where dot means differentiation with respect to r. Without even trying to solve this problem, my question is simply this: how can k show up in the differential equation? Neither A nor Y are functions of r, and k is just a subscript on f.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Schutz, page 246

Loading...

Similar Threads for Schutz page | Date |
---|---|

Schutz page 294 (Deflection of light) | Jul 6, 2015 |

Schutz, page 115 | Oct 22, 2005 |

Schutz, page 226 again | Oct 18, 2005 |

Schutz, page 226 - Black hole formation | Oct 13, 2005 |

Schutz, page 224 | Oct 13, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**