Here is a question from problem 26 part a on page 246 of "A First Course in GR" by Schutz. I doubt that it can be answered by someone without a copy of the book, but I have thought that before and been wrong. If someone without the book wants to help and needs more information then of course I would promptly provide it.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Eq. (9.58) in the vacuum region outside the source - i.e., where [itex]S_{\mu \nu} = 0[/itex] - can be solved by separation of variables.

Eq (9.58) (edited) follows:

[tex]

(\nabla^2 + \Omega^2)(\bar{h}_{\mu \nu}e^{i\Omega t}) = 0

[/tex]

Assume a solution for [itex]\bar{h}_{\mu \nu}[/itex] has the form

[tex]

\Sigma_{km}A^{km}_{\mu \nu}f_k(r)Y_{km}(\theta, \phi)/\sqrt{r}

[/tex]

where [itex]Y_{km}[/itex] is the spherical harmonic. (The book uses l as does everyone else on the planet, but I changed l to k so that this post would read more easily).

(a) Show that [itex]f_k(r)[/itex] satisfies the equation:

[tex]

\ddot{f}_k + \frac{1}{r}\dot{f}_k + [\Omega^2 - \frac{(k+\frac{1}{2})^2}{r^2}]f_k = 0

[/tex]

where dot means differentiation with respect to r. Without even trying to solve this problem, my question is simply this: how can k show up in the differential equation? Neither A nor Y are functions of r, and k is just a subscript on f.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Schutz, page 246

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**