Search patterns in observational studies

AI Thread Summary
Astronomers prioritize star selection for exoplanet searches based on detection methods, with proximity and star type being crucial factors. Direct imaging requires close stars due to resolution limits, while infrared imaging targets younger stars emitting heat. Supergiant stars are generally poor candidates for planet detection due to their mass and low likelihood of causing detectable shifts. Despite the focus on distant exoplanets, significant knowledge exists about nearby stars, as highlighted by resources on the Alpha Centauri system. Understanding these dynamics is essential for identifying potential habitable planets close to our solar system.
stargazer3
Messages
44
Reaction score
3
Hello Physics Forums!

I've just read about the discovery of GJ 667Cc, and it made me ponder on how do astonomers develop the sequence of stars to be examined in search for exoplanets? I know that some telescopes, like Kepler mission, are just collecting raw data from a certain area of space, but what about more flexible observatories? In other words, why, discovering so many distant exoplanets, we know so little about the closest to Sun hundred or so stars (we are trying to find the closest habitable planet, aren't we)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It depends on the detection method. For example, if you wanted to do direct imaging to detect planets, your telescopes intrinsic resolution limit would set the upper boundary for the distance the star could be at, so you would image stars that were close by. And even then, if you were using Infrared imaging to detect the heat from young star systems and their planets, you would have to observe stars that were still young enough for their planets to be very hot and emit infrared radiation.

Beyond that, the type of star itself is also a major feature that you must consider. Huge, bright, supergiant stars are usually poor candidates for most detection methods,(I think) as their masses are so high that any planets in orbit would barely cause the star to shift around, making it much more difficult to detect planets using the radial velocity method. These stars would also have a much smaller amount of surface area become blocked by a transiting planet, reducing the chances of using that method as well. Plus, most people are more interested in "sun like" stars, as the star system would be much more similar to Earth's.

In other words, why, discovering so many distant exoplanets, we know so little about the closest to Sun hundred or so stars (we are trying to find the closest habitable planet, aren't we)?

Who says we don't know much?
 
Drakkith is right, astronomers do know quite a lot about our nearest stars.
Here is an article I found interesting about the Altha Centauri system. Has nice charts displaying what the orbital distances of such planets might be.


Alpha Centauri
A Candidate for Terrestrial Planets And Intelligent Life
http://aether.lbl.gov/www/classes/p139/speed/Alpha-Centauri.html


The following article is also relevant to your question.

 
Thanks a lot for both responses, they cover everything I wanted to know to large extend.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top