Second order correction to the wavefunction

robbo96
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I've been doing a lot of thinking and I was wondering precisely how the 2nd order correction to the wave function from perturbation theory is derived:


6bb97b3cfe3c9497f1a34e3deca4d307.png


6e3eecb34a9ed639b8d6b94e5cb9d731.png


I mean, I can see where bits and pieces come from and I've tried to work through it as an exercise. Does anyone have a reference text on this that they can point me in the direction of? I've exhausted myself looking.

thanks!


Robert
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/Quantum_mechanics/time-independent_perturbation_theory

Note that this calculation uses the normalization \langle n|n^{(0)}\rangle=1, and the result is missing your last term. This comes from changing the normalization to \langle n|n\rangle=1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top