Second Virial Coefficient, numerically

  • Thread starter Thread starter Selveste
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient
Selveste
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Since the integrand is spherically symmetric I use spherical coordinates

\int d\vec{r} = \Omega_d\int_{0}^{\infty}dr r^{d-1}

where \Omega_d is the solid angle i d dimensions. Since I am to plot as a function of 1/\beta U_0 (= k_bT/U_0), I introduce a new varible \Theta = 1/\beta U_0 = k_bT/U_0. This gives

B_2(T) = \frac{1}{2} \Omega_d \Bigg( \int_0^R dr r^{d-1} + \int_R^{\infty} dr r^{d-1}(1-e^{\frac{1}{\Theta}(\frac{R}{r})^{\alpha}}) \Bigg)

Now I wonder if this is correct. And how to procede to compute the integrals numerically. Here R is not given. Should I just set it to some value? I thought about integrating with respect to some varible Rr or r/R, but I can't seem to get rid of R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is correct. All that remains is to calculate the two integrals numerically. To do that, you can use a numerical integration technique such as the trapezoidal or Simpson's rule, or you can use a computer algebra system such as Mathematica or Maple. The first integral will be a simple one-dimensional integral, while the second integral will require more work since it involves an exponential function.When calculating the integrals, you should set R to some value in order to obtain a result. It is best to choose a value of R that is appropriate for the given problem. In this case, it might be reasonable to set R equal to the average radius of the particles.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top